gloss

joined 1 year ago
[–] gloss@discuss.tchncs.de 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"We strenuously object to what is happening in this courtroom," he told the judge. "That President Trump is now going to spend the next two months working on this trial instead of" being out there campaigning for president "is something that shouldn't happen in this country."

"What is your legal argument?" Judge Marchan asked.

"That is my legal argument," Blanche replied.

"That's not a legal argument," Merchan said. "See you all on March 25."

Ice cold.

[–] gloss@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 1 year ago

“It’s violence against the speaker,” Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican, told NOTUS of discharge petitions.

What a fucking drama queen. Violence is when we can't obstruct on behalf of Trump and Putin!

[–] gloss@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Eighteen percent believe there is “a covert government effort” for the pop icon to help President Biden win re-election, according to a Monmouth University survey.

Why would they need a covert operation? It's already well known she's favors the Democrats and hates Trump. Why the need for a conspiracy layer to it? I'm sure the Biden team would be thrilled if she endorsed him, but that's not "a covert government effort". It's so stupid.

[–] gloss@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Roland Pryzbylewski in the house!

[–] gloss@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Additionally, authors of works of "recognized stature" may prohibit intentional or grossly negligent destruction of a work.

The very next line after the one you you quoted. Also look at the case studies of times people have been sued successfully.

[–] gloss@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It depends on the country. In the US an artist has rights and deliberately destroying an artwork can get you sued.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_Artists_Rights_Act

view more: ‹ prev next ›