@Coelacanthus @bargu isn't protons fallback esync if winesync isn't available ? Wasn't it esync -> winesync (fastsync) -> ntsync ?
glog78
joined 2 years ago
@CoyoteFacts @bargu the biggest issue ... some distributions (cachyos for example) have such a new kernel which doesn't support fsync ( winesync ) and you want to use the newest kernel for modern amd gpu's ( eg.: 9070 xt) so downgrade to 6.11 ( last kernel with winesync ) is not a good choice.
@Durandal @audaxdreik don't forget it has a modern reimplementation of the engine -> https://arx-libertatis.org/
@FreedomAdvocate ;) just saying you are making things up ... i never said something should be free and yes we are done
@FreedomAdvocate This is my last answer.
Anti Consumer = working against the Consumer ...
^^^ if you define NVidias Consumer as business
If you define NVidia Consumers as common people wanting a gamer gpu than you can keep believing that they try to do all those things to make you the cheapest and best offer and keep buying them.
I am not going to stop you! Since you don't know me and you don't know my experience and past with nvidia and seem not want to accept my standpoint -> i am not going to force it on you. But i want to ask you to refer from calling something "most stupid" just because you aren't sharing the other opinion...
@FreedomAdvocate there is a reason why WINE = Wine is not (a) Emulator is used. So don't call a api reimplementation a emulation specially since other api reimplementation have shown to be better than the original implementation from the hardware provider ( example dxvk on amd > the original amd dx implementation ) . But this gets us far from the original topics , my point was if nvidia wanted to have real competition they would have included all those new fance features into official api's like for example DX or Vulkan or any other.
They didn't ... and while not directly against the consumer it is against the consumer end.
So i have brought up another point why i call nvidia anti consumer ... neither you like it or not.
@FreedomAdvocate what is more shady a reviewer who doesn't follow nda's or the company who makes nda's ... you can decide yourself i have made my decission and we have since then got far away from what it was.. Is NVIDIA anti consumer ... yes on multiple levels ... you can disagree but i have enough resons to say so
@FreedomAdvocate so you didn't read the heise link which showed you that pre release tests had strict rules on how to test including framegen settings ...
@FreedomAdvocate ... this question is totally unimportant for the fact that their current behaivior is not very consumer friendly or harder expressed anti consumer.
Second cuda is not hardware dependend ;) https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA/tree/master | https://www.xda-developers.com/nvidia-cuda-amd-zluda/
"Imagine a world where noone needed a brand specific addition to have modern features" ... oh those ideas exist since centuries ( DX / OpenGL / Vulkan .... ) ... now ask yourself why nvidia always tries to operate outside of those api's ?
....
@FreedomAdvocate https://forums.tomshardware.com/threads/ati-cheating-on-benchmarks.877565/
read about that when they got grilled in the early 2000s
And how much nvidia influences media ->
@Alaknar i didn't notice that there wasn't an update. I think in a way the project was finished , cause as far as i remember you could play the game from the start to the finish.