glans

joined 2 years ago
[–] glans@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago

downloaded a car, found it in the glove compartment

[–] glans@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago

I have the impression that the pro-neanderthal sentiment can be a thin end of a racist wedge.

Here is a map from wikipedia captioned "Known Neanderthal range in Europe (blue), Southwest Asia (orange), Uzbekistan (green), and the Altai Mountains (violet) ":

So look at that and think, "what would a racist see". Don't be to cute about it.

With neanderthals being actually pretty smart and cool, they can be seen to contribute that certain je ne sais quoi to white people that makes them actually biologically distinct from other humans. Which is of course a closed question (FAKE) generally speaking.

I'm not saying that's true and I'm not saying anyone here is saying it. I'm just saying that there could be some motivated reasoning.

[–] glans@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I decided to check as yous call it "natopedia" to find out what nato thinks of this

All I can conclude is that the actual page for penises is much longer than the page on vaginals. I think I discovered the two most bonkers wp pages.

[–] glans@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago

lolololololol

if Q can't be a huge troll with a huge D than

[–] glans@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

trot groups in england were very heavily infiltrated by cops for decades as were others in the west. Search "swp" in the Undercover Policing Inquiry published evidence

there was a zine I read years and years ago that explained how (and maybe why) trots love making front groups to ruin every little progressive project. It was before all this infiltration stuff came out but when it did, everything made sense. The title was "monopolize resistance" I can't find it online.

[–] glans@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago

Being so heavily infiltrated that the organization is basically run by the feds doesn't indicate some kind of inherent danger posed towards the state. It suggests that the organic membership are fools.

UK SWP was used for 20 years by the cops as a base from which to attack left-types. https://www.spycops.co.uk https://www.ucpi.org.uk/ International Socialists/Socialist Workers Party Archives - Undercover Policing Inquiry

Why people don't like trots is because they are often associated with personal and organizational ruin due to being agents of capital.

[–] glans@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had an n of 346.

included and excluded

  • included: only where the first word was "yes","no","maybe"
  • had intended to be case insensitive but realized after everything was done that I accidentally excluded 2 people who answered in all caps
  • below in method, this is fixed so if you follow it you will get slight variation
  • included: first listed pronoun only (otherwise too complicated)
    • eg: [he/him, comrade/them] = he, [she/her, they/them] = she
    • in Methods spoiler it includes a way to get all 4 if you want but it would need to be cleaned up
  • excluded: text in spoilers (too complicated)
  • excluded: accounts not on hexbear.net (no pronouns)
  • excluded: deleted replies

method

  • opened the thread and scrolled to the end, I think maybe selecting "chat" button at the top lets you get more responses? Also I tried sorting a couple different ways and copying everything as later it is deduplicated
  • note: am using firefox on linux with extensions that might affect the results; I didn't think to disable or anything at the beginning but I would if I were to repeat
  • selected all responses and copy to clipboard
  • go to https://regex101.com/
  • paste in the Test string text box
  • on left sidebar select Function > List
  • in the Regular expression field (above Test string), paste: /^(\w+) \[(\w+).*\](.*\n.*\n+)(no|yes|maybe)/gim
  • in the List field, (below Test string), paste $1;$2;$4;\n
  • here I used ; (semi colon) as column delimiter (used semicolon instead of , (comma) for compatibility when scraping all 4 pronouns)

expected output is like this:

useruseruser1;he;Yes;
useruseruser2;he;No;
useruseruser3;he;no;
useruseruser4;she;Yes;
useruseruser5;he;No;
  • copy and paste the contents of List text box into a text file results.csv and save

Set up spreadsheet

  • use a regular text editor (like notepad.exe on windows) to create a plain text file called template.csv
  • paste the following:
"number","UID","pron","ans","concat","pron count","pron count %","ans count","ans count %","cat count","cat count %","keep","n"
"=RANDBETWEEN.NV(10000,99999)",,,,"=CONCAT(C2,""-"",D2)","=COUNTIF(C:C,C2)","=ROUND(F2/$M2,3)*100","=COUNTIF(D:D,D2)","=ROUND(H2/$M2,3)*100","=COUNTIF(E:E,E2)","=ROUND(J2/$M2,3)*100",1,"=COUNTIF(L:L,1)"
  • Launch LibreOffice Calc (open source Excel)
  • File > Open and select template.csv It should open the text import dialogue. Important settings:
    • Separated by: comma (uncheck the others)
    • String delimiter: " (double quotation marks)
    • Other options: CHECK Evaluate formulas
  • This should give you a 2 row spreadsheet
  • You might want to use File > Save As to save it as ODS format which allows more features compared to csv. I name this file combined.ods.

Open results

  • File > Open and select results.csv. It should open the text import dialogue. Important settings:
    • Separated by: semicolon (uncheck the others) note this is different than the previous step!!
  • You should get a new spreadsheet document with 3 colulmns:
    • Column A: usernames
    • Column B: Pronouns
    • Column C: Response (Yes/No/Maybe)
  • Drag to select all the text
  • Copy to clipboard
  • Close this file (once the next part works)

Put results in template

  • Go back to your other file, combined.ods
  • Select all content of row 2
  • drag to fill down several hundred rows (however many results you have)
  • Place cursor in cell B2 (blank under column heading UID
  • Paste clipboard
  • You should get 300something rows inserted to columns B, C, D
  • You must delete the extra template rows (otherwise your n will be wrong)
  • You must manually edit the column called n (the last column, actually it is column number M) so that each value is 1. by default it will start to count so the values will because 1, 2, 3 etc. Should be 1,1,1.
    • This column controls whether the row is included in the data. If you set the value for 0 it will be excluded. So you can keep data you want to exclude in the sheet.

Now you must know how to use a spreadsheet. I suggest fixing all the answers to be the same case otherwise Yes and yes might be different in some circumstances.

Briefly the columns are: -A: number: assigns a random number so the file can be shared without publishing usernames - anonymizes data but lets you keep a record of how you got the results. How to:

  • open a copy of file
  • delete the column UID
  • sort by column number (otherwise results will still be in the order as on the page and it might be possible to infer information)
  • I didn't include it in the template but I actually also checked there were not any duplicate numbers also; you should do this
  • B: UID: user name
  • C: pron: first pronoun
  • D: ans: the answer provided -E: concat: combines columns C and D. Expected output like she-Yes. This is respresented in "Pronoun answer combinations" -F: pron count, H: ans count, J: cat count: absolute number of each -G: pron count %, I: ans count %, K: cat count %: the count value of each as a % of *n* -L: keep: whether to include this line (explained elsewhere) -M: n`: total number of included rows

method variation: to capture all 4 pronounsas above except:

  • in the Regular expression field (above Test string), paste: /^(\w+) \[(.*)\](.*\n.*\n+)(no|yes|maybe|deleted)/gim

expected output is like this:

useruseruser1;he/him, they/them;Yes;
useruseruser2;he/him;No;
useruseruser3;he/him, des/pair;no;
useruseruse4r;she/her;Yes;
useruseruser5;he/him;No;

subsequent instructions such as the spreadsheet may need adjustment



RESULTS

For some reason the markdown tables are black text on black text dark grey background on my computer. I can't seem to fix that it's a problem with the website theme. Idk I'm tired of this by now.


table: total answer %

ans count % ans
46.8% No
43.9% Yes
9.2% Maybe

csv: total answer %

percent,answer
46.8%,No
43.9%,Yes
9.2%,Maybe

table: Pronoun answer combinations %

percent pronoun answer
35.8% he No
25.1% she Yes
7.5% they Yes
4.3% comrade No
3.5% none No
3.2% he Maybe
3.2% any Maybe
2.9% comrade Yes
2.6% he Yes
2.3% any Yes
1.7% any No
0.9% they No
0.9% it Yes
0.9% fae Yes
0.6% they Maybe
0.6% she No
0.6% she Maybe
0.6% none Yes
0.6% comrade Maybe
0.3% ze Yes
0.3% xey Yes
0.3% undecided Maybe
0.3% none Maybe
0.3% love Yes
0.3% fae Maybe
0.3% e Yes
0.3% e Maybe

csv: Pronoun answer combinations %

percent,pronoun,answer
35.8%,he,No
25.1%,she,Yes
7.5%,they,Yes
4.3%,comrade,No
3.5%,none,No
3.2%,he,Maybe
3.2%,any,Maybe
2.9%,comrade,Yes
2.6%,he,Yes
2.3%,any,Yes
1.7%,any,No
0.9%,they,No
0.9%,it,Yes
0.9%,fae,Yes
0.6%,they,Maybe
0.6%,she,No
0.6%,she,Maybe
0.6%,none,Yes
0.6%,comrade,Maybe
0.3%,ze,Yes
0.3%,xey,Yes
0.3%,undecided,Maybe
0.3%,none,Maybe
0.3%,love,Yes
0.3%,fae,Maybe
0.3%,e,Yes
0.3%,e,Maybe

table: Pronoun answer %

pron count % pron
41.6% he
26.3% she
9% they
7.8% comrade
7.2% any
4.3% none
1.2% fae
0.9% it
0.6% e
0.3% ze
0.3% xey
0.3% undecided
0.3% love

csv: Pronoun answer %

percent,pronoun
41.6%,he
26.3%,she
9%,they
7.8%,comrade
7.2%,any
4.3%,none
1.2%,fae
0.9%,it
0.6%,e
0.3%,ze
0.3%,xey
0.3%,undecided
0.3%,love

[–] glans@hexbear.net 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I appreciate the guts here. Just fucking go for it. Push the limits. I've done it in different contexts, sometimes it works somewhat and sometimes you get fucked. But if you can, you should. Make them fucking work. Especially if you aren't already tied up in collective class conflict. And sometimes, when you are.

OTOH in the realm of "legal precedence" there is a big risk because where we're concerned while a victory of one isn't a triumph to all, an injury to one is a defeat for all. Particularly when embarking on "test cases." (Not sure if this was intended to be, or ended up being, a test case? Maybe nothing new happened here other than some attention.)

Ultimately anything good always comes from the organized power of the working class.

[–] glans@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I just searched for this game and the first thing I see at https://openmw.org/ seems to be saying they are moving away from open source? In app ads, fees, marketplace and telemetry (if you live outside california or the EU where presumably regulations prohibit it).

edit it was posted april 1st is it some sort of joke

[–] glans@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Molesting children .... to maintain capitalism

infiltrate organizations that threaten capital

infiltrate pedo communities

So does it maintain capital or threaten capital?

And if it maintains capitalism because of kompromat, then does being open about it thwart the whole plan?

[–] glans@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

"it worked great for steve jobs!"

view more: ‹ prev next ›