So if I report the news and comment on the news, my commentary invalidates my reporting?
By this logic, all news articles that cite other news articles and comment on them cease to function as news articles.
So if I report the news and comment on the news, my commentary invalidates my reporting?
By this logic, all news articles that cite other news articles and comment on them cease to function as news articles.
Also a valid example, I'm just of the mindset that everything is inherently political at its core.
Other valid examples: Persistent bureaucratic inefficiency, corporate selective inefficiency ("boy we were really fast at polluting that town in Ohio but it's going to take us ages to clean it up. The EPA is to blame!"), and of course race and gender common examples explicitly mentioned in the article ("but cleaning is 'women's work'"; "what do you mean black people have it tough in a white-majority society founded by wealthy white agrarian slaveholders?")
9 month old account. Super obvious propagandist with a single agenda.
See also: Everything I don't like is right-wing, and other basic liberal things.
See also: Everything I don't like is Russian misinfo/disinfo, and other basic liberal things.
<-- He's loving it
This would necessitate the existence of a heart to begin with.
Reddit Users:
To be fair, it's a short Wikipedia article that really only glosses over the concept, but there's lots of other articles on it online, including if I remember correctly a Psychology Today article.