It's a convenience article. They're just reporting some number they have access to.
I'd bet mastodon saw an increase, but i haven't seen the numbers.
It's also hard to get a good count since it's not centralized. So whatever numbers we do see, could be wildly underreported.
Sadly, I'm out at the moment.
Depends on your interests, my feed is too active. It's a lot of shitposting, some academics, journalists, and some just very online people.
A lot of very prolific folks from Twitter moved there.
Same. Mine's too lively, but it is fairly heavily skewed towards some specific interests.
I check maybe once a day, but I can't keep up with all that's going on there.
I signed up ages ago too, but I don't think they ever sent them out like that. I got an invite from someone else.
I think it's largely about control, but on a couple of different levels.
The people who fund the party, use it as a funnel to regress protections and restrictions so they can concentrate wealth and power and force people into situations that ensure that.
The people who vote are left in constant fear that they don't have control over their lives, their futures, and everything is being taken away from them (it's not true, but it's easy to manufacture that perspective).
The politicians leverage this by targeting smaller groups of people, pushing them as a threat, and using it to mobilize votes for nonsensical policies that don't solve any issues the voters actually face. But it feels like progress. Since 2016, there's an additional side of this where it's given some people the audacity to think they can treat people like shit, again because it gives them a sense of being able to control something in their lives, and this is really powerful as a motivator. It doesn't matter that it works against their entire identity they've built up.
Yes, that's part of what's surprising about the number.
What was it prior to using a phone? Did they have external devices or something that notified you?
The named email says Abbott's teams are working to "verify and confirm compatibility", so it's unclear if this is an actual issue or just a precaution over what they think could be an issue.
It's also easier to find and fix bugs with smaller numbers of people, especially performance bugs which can be amplified at scale. So it gives them a lot of time to work through issues over the beta. It also gives them time to build teams around the expanding infrastructure and build processes for monitoring and handling issues as a larger team.
Plus, these invite only periods start with more tech savy early adopters who more willing to put up with issues, and willing to provide decent bug reports to fix them.