It can mess with configs, themes and some other annoying stuff so I never did it again but there is no big risk or anything, it's just a little tedious to fix small things afterwards!
gamey
Dan haben viele deutsche Schulen wohl nicht die besten chancen!
Der hat wenigstens keine Salmonellen!
Klingt ja fast als ob die Leute sich das nicht freiwillig aussuchen...
Did you read my comment at all? Flatpak and Snap share dependencies while Appimage doublicates all of them so unless you have no big dependencies on your system (literally impossible with Linux systems) Flatpaks and Snaps become more efficient in terms of storage usage the more you use them because they share big parts while Appimage still dublicates every single dependency because it's a single binarie with everything in it...
Well, that's your choice, I like and use Flatpaks but noone has to do so!
Your preinstalled SMS app is usually the best way to receive SMS, I wouldn't give and unnecessary app permissions to access them!
Damn, that's awful!
Both have laws like that in the making and beside tiny formalities the UK sadly didn't abandone it at all! :/
Have you ever touched a Google phone? You CAN'T uninstalled preinstalled apps on ether of them, if you don't root your device third party app stores suck, the law allows you to get rid of preinstalled bloat, messager interoperability is included and so on, that's a huge law and the first against silicon valley giants with enforcment that will actually hurt them!
Appimage literally requires more storage for the apps because it dublicates all dependencies so in terms of storage flatpak and dnaps win by FAR, there are valid reasons to criticize all three but your comment is a sad joke!
There are just too many terms, just give enough context and people will understand it regardless tho!