galoisghost

joined 2 years ago
[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Random? That or some other bigoted bullshit was forecast to come from the third sentence.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Looks like it’s about to do a dramatic turn around and start miming some disco.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 17 points 1 month ago

And they all have addresses.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago

They don’t do it themselves. Name them and their accountants too!

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 16 points 1 month ago

It’s funny how many receptionists brothels have

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

An increasing number of people I know already go straight to ChatGPT to search for things that are not direct websites links.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 15 points 1 month ago (30 children)

The problem is the right no longer argue their points in good faith.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 10 points 1 month ago

Because like the rest of right wing populism, they offer easy answers* and their voices are amplified by algorithms.

*something or someone to blame for your woes

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

44c worth of sausage meat, what was that one patty?

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone -2 points 1 month ago (3 children)

OK new rule, when someone gets to net worth of a billion dollars we give them an award, say congratulations you win capitalism, the. Take them out the back and shoot them. Creepy fucks.

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

I can imagine a scenario where it was "rubbed in" like chemical sunscreen until invisible, and gave the absurdly low score as a genuine result of misapplication

That would make sense.

I agree that working with Choice to understand would have been a much wiser PR decision

view more: ‹ prev next ›