froztbyte

joined 2 years ago
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 3 points 7 months ago

really? the impact to your media consumption patterns and preferences is the biggest problem you have here?

seriously?

oof.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 7 months ago (1 children)

this is so wildly on point

yours?

(it should become an internet copypasta and drift into mass consciousness)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 7 months ago (8 children)

there it is, sammy has gone and said people are just prompting the model wrong (I recall we’ve had that bit said here earlier)

but in true sammy grift: you just need to be asking the right questions to trump intelligence. “why do you want to suck, as a human?” sammy asks, not understanding a moment of humanity

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 4 points 7 months ago

when I'm debugging fucked up web pages (too often), the way I approach it is by loading the entire thing with network inspector view open (to catch requests), then right-click inspect on the element or something close to it. from that I find the element name/path/whatever, and then dig around in the request view to see what happened

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 7 months ago

little known historical fact: G+ was actually the mark that service got on its popularity exam

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 19 points 7 months ago

my god, some of the useful idiots there are galling

It looks like it's reasoning pretty well to me. It came up with a correct way to count the number of r's, it got the number correct and then it compared it with what it had learned during pre-training. It seems that the model makes a mistake towards the end and writes STRAWBERY with two R and comes to the conclusion it has two.

says the tedious poster entirely ignoring the fact that this is an extremely atypical baseline response, and thus clearly is operating under prior instructions as to which methods to employ to “check its logic”

fucking promptfans. at least I have that paper from earlier to soothe me

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

the word "commentariat" was invented too early, because it would be the absolute perfect choice with which to describe such posters

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 7 months ago

I definitely don't have the spoons to read this most recent of his emanations (yes, I am picking that word), but from just the start of it alone... god

the orange man isn't even in the seat yet and all these motherfuckers are loudly shouting who they are

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 7 months ago (4 children)

oh, no no

nooooo no no no

there isn't an opt-out button

there is only:

  1. "Continue",
  2. "Learn More"
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

being absolutely incensed at blithely rambunctious imbeciles seems to be (one of?) my wordsmithing balmer peaks

(I have mixed feelings about that)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 12 points 7 months ago (8 children)

a couple weeks back, I was (bc reasons) looking around to see how to turn off goog's annoying gemini bullshit in an account, and you can!

except then even after doing that, accounts in that org still got prompts (in the form of in-app banners, and sparklebuttons in shit like gmail) to Try The Model

it looks like people aren't biting enough, because now you get it whether you like it or not, for the low low price of pushing up your base account fee! and I checked in one org - "Gemini App" is disabled org-wide, but the fucking prompt is immediately in the UI (and you get a modal popover opening gmail)

fuck these people so much

view more: ‹ prev next ›