froztbyte

joined 2 years ago
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

“intelligent” people make the best marks, donchaknow

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

first I hear of the notion that oracle would pick up and carry that. is it your hypothesis, or also from whispernets or so?

(not doubting or whatever, just curious. Oracle seems like it’d be allergic to saltman’s nonsense but given how well he can grift maybe he sold them..)

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 5 months ago (2 children)

this archive has it without paywall

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 6 months ago

and they’re as stable as how much you seem to get the point

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 6 months ago
[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 6 months ago

downrounds in AI venture funding

sickos meme image

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 11 points 6 months ago

dunno, I think it's a great contribution. not to his case, mind you, but to the collective human experience. as a warning to others, and entertainment.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

OpenAI buys services from a pile of Altman’s other portfolio companies

which reminds me of one of my actual favourite parts of the bayfuckers playacting building companies: how absolutely self-cycling a lot of the funding ends up being. shartups burning fucking piles of money on other, also-VC-funded, shartups. totally normal and healthy way for money to flow.

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

looks like they felt that chatgpt pro wasn't losing money fast enough, you can now get sora on the pro sub

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 6 points 6 months ago

digging around in the the issue linked to that, it seems like the person who closed/approved this is someone from a different, external agency who lists moz as a client (her hachy profile also lists that as her employer)

this pr was closed "because we have new copy"

there's probably some questions to be asked around how this decision/instruction got made, but one would have to wade into moz's corp and discussion systems to do so (and apparently they also have a (people mostly communicating on) Slack problem - nfi if that's open to community joining)

none of them look good tho tbh

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 8 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think it's a nonsense nothingburger "clarification", esp. given the defaults firefox sets a priori on a fresh profile. even with the "no, don't turn $x on" choices for things that it does offer those for, there's still some egregious defaults being turned on

the cynic in me says it's intentionally vague because they're trying to, in advance, lay the legal groundwork for whatever the fuck they push on by default. my motivation for that thought is because of seeing the exact playbook being used by other services in the past, and it tracks with the way they've been pushing other features lately

[–] froztbyte@awful.systems 7 points 6 months ago

did some digging and apparently the (moz poster) it's this person. check the patents.

mega groan

view more: ‹ prev next ›