mayhaps, but then it's also to be said that people who act like the phrase was "cogito ergo dim sum" also don't exactly aim for a high bar
froztbyte
joined 2 years ago
even though I get the idea you’re trying to go for, really fucking ick way to make your argument starting from “nonhuman entities” and then literally immediately mentioning enslaving black folks as the first example of bad behaviour
as to cautious erring: that still leaves you in the position of being used as a useful idiot
the fundamental problem with your posts (and the pov you’re posting them from) is the framing of the issue as though there is any kind of mind, of cognition, of entity, in any of these fucking systems
it’s an unproven one, and it’s not one you’ll find any kind of support for here
it’s also the very mechanism that the proponents of bullshit like “ai alignment” use to push the narrative, and how they turn folks like yourself into free-labour amplifiers
and not just post it, but posted preserving links - wtf
wow, you’re really speedrunning these arcade games, you must want that golden ticket real bad
hopefully someone pasted the llmentalist article link to that person
it’s when you have to get the AI slotted up just right in the printer, otherwise it wedges stuck and you have to disassemble the whole thing
yes, you’ve gotta be right, that must be exactly what’s happening. absolutely no other possibilities.
your posts keep just slinging words together and it’s just fucking weird
negative reactions? to your own shitty posts?
well fuck damn, I wonder what’s confusing
once again: the fuck is this post
can't wait for the training set biases to cause a fresh horror for marginalised groups that happen to have to use this shit because it's forced on them. I'm sure it'll all go perfectly and nothing bad will happen
:|