the exasperation I so often express is not for nothing :|
froztbyte
curious, that art style in that reply strongly matches the image I saw on this toot drifting by in my timeline earlier
haven't seen them before, but a short tour around their infra/systems providers isn't particularly exciting - depending on both your threat model and what-you-want in a vendor
some parts/pages do provide some detail in encouraging depth, but I'd have to do a much more full review to give you a good answer
there's been a couple of "where email" threads over the last year, tuta's still one of the top options on that but you can check the threads if you want to see some of the other promising options
fuck nostr. flere and fullsquare covered the details well tho
yeah it’s very much an intentional usage of poisoned language to construct a targeted outcome
but arrrrrrgh
could I, like, not do that? would suit my needs better. kthx
I realize it’s been poisoned since/by coiners, but god I hate that usage of “democratize”
@sundogplanets was posting about this not too long ago, I’ll try find the thread a bit later
e: thread
wasn't common crawl the one that pulled a similar trick to goog's "if you label a thing as $x we won't include you"[0]? I could swear I heard their name in association with some derpshit intake management stuff above and beyond the typical fundamental "free/open scraper set" problems
[0] - a tactic google first pulled with Streetview cars pulling in a pile of wifi beacons and tying it to location - "if you don't want it just rename your AP to '{prefix} - {apname}'". a reply that was just dumb and aggravating but also it fucking sucks that basically no standards have taken this problem to heart in the ~15y hence