friendlymessage

joined 2 years ago
[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Unfortunately, most scientific papers are behind paywalls, especially the most prestigious journals. So this doesn't make much sense.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Don't leave us hanging, what is your answer to their last question?

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Maybe read the article first

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

No, because you're arguing in bad faith. They said "anyone can do it" which is obvious bullshit as there are enough companies run into the ground by incompetent CEOs. I never said nobody else that is not currently a CEO could do it which is the strawman that you are implying.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago (5 children)

That statement is delusional

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

Für München fehlen in Google Maps komplett die Livedaten. Bei den vielen Verspätungen und Ausfällen halt ziemlich nutzlos

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 17 points 2 years ago

Italy quite literally has a "neo-fascist" government, similarities to the GOP of course are purely coincidental.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you're just talking out of your ass?

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That depends on the specific TLS setup. Badly configured TLS 1.2 would allow downgrade attacks, TLS 1.3 would not. I highly doubt the "in most circumstances" line, my guess would be that at least the big ones like gmail don't allow unsecured communication with their servers at all. If not for their users's privacy, then at least to combat spam.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's also better because the font is not awful

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Most emails are unencrypted.

No, they are not. They are not end-to-end encrypted but they are encrypted between your PC and your service provider, between service providers and between service providers and receivers. End-to-end encryption is needed to defend against your service provider or entities that can order your provider around but not against random hackers snooping around in your network.

Fax on the other hand is never encrypted and also not signed, so there is no integrity protection. Fax is far, far less secure than even standard email. Businesses require fax often for legal reasons because laws are written by people with no technical understanding not because of any technical reason.

[–] friendlymessage@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Es ist halt - mal wieder - ein Entwurf. Der wurde selbstverständlich nicht zu Ende gedacht, dann wäre er ja kein Entwurf mehr.

view more: ‹ prev next ›