"Okay everyone find a partner" are the words I least want to hear at these kind of things
Thought that was Willem Dafoe for a second.
Oh cool. Never had a doubt of course. Off to Narnia next apparently (which means I'll have to wait even longer for my imagined Gerwig Star Wars, unfortunately).
I like the idea that these reviewers all had the concept for a perfect Barbie movie, and are then criticising this one for not living up to it.
I think that - like most people - when I heard that Gerwig was making a movie out of Barbie, I thought: how the hell is she going to do that?
Argh. Sorry. Edited. It's nice that we can edit post titles at least.
Yeah I found her captivating in an androgynous sort-of way. It was very tempting to just post a full frame of her beautiful face.
She has a few iconic scenes towards the end of the film, but they're difficult to capture because they're blurred by VFX.
Also, it was a strange I-guess-I'll-just-die-now of drowning.
Just watched ep 1. Think I'll continue in the same way I watched season 1: admiring how good it looks, but finding it frustrating.
As an example: as welcome as a naked Lee Pace fight scene is, it didn't really establish how many assassins there were / what they were doing at any given moment.
Was good to see Holt McCallney (from Mindhunter), show up though.
I've been thinking along the same lines. The bot will catch up on its own missing data in a couple of days - so it's won't need to do the "over 7 days / over 6 days" biz. When everything is for over 7 days, I'll start putting new entries at the top (with maybe just a single line, for previously mentioned stuff)
I think this is the issue - if the community itself isn't tagged, blocking NSFW on your account doesn't filter the posts (although they should be blurry if the posts themselves are tagged).
Fortunately, most of the untagged communities (inc. celebs) are modded by a user called Madness, so blocking him cleared up my feed.
Are there any good fan-edits of ep 3, that keep the good and remove the sucky parts?
I bought a cheap 'mp3 player' from eBay when I was trying to use my phone less, but it was rubbish: no library function (just the files, listed in the order they were copied), m4a support was limited to low-complexity), Bluetooth dropped if I moved my head.
I was surprised, because there's definitely system-on-a-chip + open-source software combinations that would make a good, cheap player. The kind of places that make them though, will always prefer to use even-cheaper components than what the final retail price would suggest.
So, because everyone uses their phone for music listening now, it's hard to get a dumb player. They're either rubbish, like I bought, or they're completely at the other end of the scale (as in more expensive than a phone)