flango

joined 2 years ago
[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 3 months ago
[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Find the snorlax' face

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 3 months ago

Based on the font choice, this seems legit

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 3 months ago

Space burger

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

This used to be such an interesting site. I hate how they paywalled everything now, it doesn't make sense

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 3 months ago

Nice, I didn't know about this one, thanks for sharing

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 3 months ago

Yes, win-win scenario

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 3 months ago
[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 4 months ago

Easy. Hotdog.

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 4 months ago

Nop, it just smells like you are wrong.

As Whitman shows, the Nuremberg Laws were crafted in an atmosphere of considerable attention to the precedents American race laws had to offer. German praise for American practices, already found in Hitler’s Mein Kampf, was continuous throughout the early 1930s, and the most radical Nazi lawyers were eager advocates of the use of American models. But while Jim Crow segregation was one aspect of American law that appealed to Nazi radicals, it was not the most consequential one. Rather, both American citizenship and antimiscegenation laws proved directly relevant to the two principal Nuremberg Laws—the Citizenship Law and the Blood Law. Whitman looks at the ultimate, ugly irony that when Nazis rejected American practices, it was sometimes not because they found them too enlightened, but too harsh.

Reference: https://press.princeton.edu/books/hardcover/9780691172422/hitlers-american-model

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 89 points 4 months ago (7 children)

with the idea of re-founding humanity

the desire to start from scratch without the legal constraints of Earth

What they are doing is playing the old book of the nazis

[–] flango@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 4 months ago
 

We need answers for why 2023 turned out to be the warmest year in possibly the past 100,000 years. And we need them quickly.

 

História sensacional!

 

The report was released on 14 March, in time for the next round of negotiations for a United Nations treaty on global plastic pollution. Scientists have been campaigning for the treaty, which deals with all aspects of plastic production and waste management, to include a list of plastic polymers and chemicals of concern — some of which are known to leach into food, water and the environment, with impacts for human and ecosystem health.

It’s unclear whether the plastics treaty will be completed in December. So far, the negotiations have been hampered by a few petrochemical states that are resisting strong regulation of plastics production.

 

Não sou Corinthiano, mas esses caras têm meu respeito.

 

one assessment suggests that ChatGPT, the chatbot created by OpenAI in San Francisco, California, is already consuming the energy of 33,000 homes. It’s estimated that a search driven by generative AI uses four to five times the energy of a conventional web search. Within years, large AI systems are likely to need as much energy as entire nations.

 

Interesting animation, it has mixture of weirdness and personality that makes it "a bit real", in some sense?

 

Great lyrics.

 

Não me parece uma boa alternativa e/ou opção para investir... Deveríamos estar financiando pesquisas para alternativas de fato sustentáveis e limpas. O que acham? Me parece que é mais um lobby das fabricantes de carro para não mudarem nada.

 

Good to known !

 

Fixing car and e-bike batteries saves money and resources, but challenges are holding back the industry

 

Amazing stuff.

view more: ‹ prev next ›