God, this thread is awful. People will really find any excuse to be transphobic/shitty in general. I might be one of these 'anti-AI trolls' (which I'll admit is half right), but this reaction is completely out of proportion and in no way acceptable. I'm sorry Mystic and the dbzero team are having to deal with this (again).
Locking in favour of https://feddit.uk/post/33000121. Normally I'd remove, but as there's comments I'll keep this up.
It does feel like she's conflating colourism with racism. Some of the most abhorrent things I've heard people say are against travellers and it's hard not to call that racism. These were 'normal' people who genuinely think they're not racist. I feel like if black people felt so alienated from wider society that only 1/5-1/4 of them could read she would have no problem (rightly) calling this an issue of systemic racism.
He's actually already the most popular politician on TikTok.
Coming in 1.0: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/5601
Not helpful now obviously, but nice that's it's already implemented.
I’m a bit burnt out of trying to have alternatives to lemmy.ml communities.
I can understand that, it is an uphill battle. !linux@programming.dev at least is doing well.
It's just annoying from a user perspective to have to keep up with all this intricate instance politics for a single comm. Maybe p.dev is the right choice just because it's so uncontroversial so won't cause issues.
It does seem to be an ideological opposition to db0's AI stance, though it doesn't really make sense to me because, like you said, c/privacy doesn't have anything to do with AI: https://lemmy.nz/comment/15894250
I can't really see the benefit in bending over backwards to accommodate someone who won't even communicate.
IRRC, there's some issues with reports federating but I think those got fixed, but the sidebar of !communityrequest@sh.itjust.works says to have an account there.
Yeah they seem to be, I'll open an SJW account and ask to have the comm transferred.
Perfect moderation doesn't exi-
Let’s say tomorrow the feddit.uk team decides to self host a PDS provider.
Is it possible for the feddit.uk team to ban someone, or can that only be done by Bluesky? Would that ban be federated to other PDS providers?
We could stop hosting the account and purge it from our DB, though IRRC the user can migrate to a new host and have Bluesky populate that with their old data, because everything is public on AT and is kept in Bluesky's relay (I think this is a bad thing, just fyi). The user would still be banned from the various labelers as these operate (I presume) on the accounts DID, which should stay the same across migration. PDS providers don't talk to each other, PDS don't do much so don't really need to. They just store data.
Edit: I feel like Bluesky has the same issue than the Fediverse has with federated bans and alts, but because everybody uses Bluesky’s centralized components, nobody notices.
Bluesky does genuinely have some better moderation tools, labelers are something I think even us on Lemmy/PieFed/whatever might want to look at. But these aren't magic and there's plenty of toxicity on Bluesky, Bluesky just gives you some more tools to help manage it. When Mastodon gets the ability to disable replies I think will help a lot.
TBF, Chrome doesn't support it on Linux either.