ferralcat

joined 2 years ago
[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought this was disallowed by the app store.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Even that seems kinda half ass in this version. Like you think you'd be able to drag a window from your monitor outside the monitor. Instead, it just... Shows your monitor again.

I am not the target market for this device though. I'm not really sure who is, beyond the diehard apple people.

I do find it funny how quickly apple pr moves from the "when they do something they do it right" to "well this is first gen so we expect it has some flaws".

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm super curious if they nominated Haley how it would go, but democrats didn't do much better. When there is a woman on the ballot the bar suddenly gets shot to the moon.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I dont think there's any need to give the benefit of the doubt to these people anymore. You might argue they believe LGBTQ people shouldn't exist, and I might believe you, but I tend to think their main motivation is just stirring up anger and resentment against the "other side".

If people were concerned about privacy or safety, the us would have single user bathrooms or at least stalls that didn't have 1in gaps around the doors (my 90s high school didn't have stall doors at all, and in some bathrooms didn't even have stalls, just a toilet next to the sink in the locker room). The same people aren't upset about those things, because they don't actually care about any of this.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't the Florida case in alignment with the Chicago one? The courts ruled for the transgender kid in both.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 12 points 2 years ago

I'm just shocked to learn that Siri has (had) a quality control team.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 6 points 2 years ago

I get these pages from time to time here in Thailand on Google. I always think it's because of some nerfarious people here, but this makes me suspicious it's just a bunch of Americans using vpns.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 1 points 2 years ago

I've heard it's just more of a burocracy thing. A friend there once told me he always puts the date wrong on the top of documents because there is a person who's job is to double check your work. They're judged on how often they find mistakes, so it's easier to put something blatantly wrong at the top that easily fixed so they can quickly find it and he can move on.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc -1 points 2 years ago

Cultures who use bidets and not the bum gun will always confuse me. Ones a robot strapped to the toilet that does a medicore job at one thing, then other is a cheap water gun you can use for all sorts of shit (pun intended).

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

He showed up at a pro Palestinian protest to try and dox the students there. They asked him to leave. He ignored them and was then escorted out. People did not say nice things to him.

I'm not sure there was a lot to punish.

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 1 points 2 years ago

I start d (slowly) reading this and... Is this how legal briefs are written? It seems like a reddit blog post. For instance in the examples section they write "SJp ... is one of the most vitriolic antisemitic networks on college campuses. SJP was founded by the chairman of American Muslims for Palestine (“AMP”), the leadership of which overlaps with the leadership of organizations that have been shut down by federal authorities, whose assets were frozen by the U.S. Treasury Department, or that were found liable in civil actions for providing material support to Hamas. SJP receives funding and training from AMP as well as from universities. SJP and its affiliates sponsor antisemitic events, host antisemitic speakers..." All of which I'm reading expecting a citation somewhere... Anywhere. It seems like easily verifiable stuff. But there is none. Is this how legal briefs are written?

[–] ferralcat@monyet.cc 23 points 2 years ago

These people will literally apply the death penalty for jaywalkers as long as the jaywalker is "them* (i.e. non white l, male, or just someone they slightly disagree with) and then scream online about how theyre protected from censorship by the first amendment.

view more: ‹ prev next ›