eneff

joined 2 years ago
[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 years ago (15 children)

(Ökologisch ist es am besten tierische Lebensmittel gar nicht erst zu konsumieren.)

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Ich raff's nicht.

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Glad to help! Just keep in mind that what you're doing there is dumping the entire dconf settings tree and applying it as is. That will include a lot of things you don't want/care about, including state data of certain applications. You should probably sift through the dump file and throw stuff out before loading it again, but I'm sure you'll figure it out.

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (3 children)

export settings on old pc:

dconf dump / > dconf-settings.dump

import on new pc:

cat dconf-settings.dump | dconf load /

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago

Als jemand, dessen 'kleines Problemchen' mit Gras mittlerweile fast ausgewachsen ist, lese ich solche Kommentare immer mit sehr gemischten Gefühlen.

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ich stimme dir weitestgehend zu, muss aber auch noch mal meinen Senf dazu geben.

Wenn man das uralte, hundert Mal widerlegte Argument sieht, kann man auch einfach weiterscrollen und/oder ein Downvote da lassen und gut ist.

Der Ansatz mag helfen, wenn es darum geht, nicht selbst die ganze Zeit in ewig wiederkehrende Diskussionen verwickelt zu werden, die relevantere Problematik ist meiner Meinung nach aber die Tatsache, dass solche fehlerhaften, leicht widerlegbaren Argumente ständig öffentlich reproduziert werden und – vor allem dann, wenn niemand widerspricht – ohne jede Form der Einordnung gelesen, für oberflächlich stichhaltig befunden, und im schlimmsten Fall verinnerlicht werden.

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Ich musste beim Kommentarelesen seit langem mal wieder laut lachen, danke dafür! ~

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

I'm not saying that cost of power is entirely irrelevant.

I'm saying that "My setup consumes a lot of power, but that's fine because it doesn't cost me much" is kind of backwards. While monetary cost certainly is one of the arguments for energy efficiency, responsibly using resources and avoiding wasting energy are way more compelling ones imo. That especially applies if your energy isn't produced via renewable means.

Even if power was entirely free of monetary cost, you shouldn't waste it, don't you agree?

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago

Whatever comes with GNOME/gdm.

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I really don't like how people most commonly try to justify the monetary cost of their power consumption.

In my opinion the way more important metrics should be how the energy you are consuming is generated and how much carbon emissions are caused by it.

Who cares that your 2000W@230V idle are "free", if that means you are burning crude oil in your backyard to generate it..

[–] eneff@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Lemmy is packaged already, and you can find configuration options here.

kbin is not packaged yet, thus there are no configuration options for it.

There currently is an open issue requesting it to be packaged here.

view more: ‹ prev next ›