emmanuelw

joined 1 year ago
[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No, you're reformulating the verse. I'm asking for context. What was the discussion about?

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Okay, I'll bait. What's the context of this text? Or in other words: what's Jesus speaking about?

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 1 points 5 days ago (5 children)

What are you doing, citing verses without understanding them in their context, if not “living your truth”?

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 1 points 6 days ago (7 children)

I looked to first link, and the first biblical reference was Luke 16:23. It's a parable… not a description of actual hell… I saw enough to know that it's not theologically serious.

The rest of your message is cherrypicking. You can't cite verses without providing any context or analysis, staying on the surface of things, and think you make a point. Again, not theologically serious. You should study the Bible praying, make it resonate with the life of the marginalized people that Jesus came to meet, not just choosing the verses that confirm your preconceptions, or you'll make the Bible saying the contrary of what it says by cherrypicking and staying too literal. Nobody can make this work for you.

Imagine someone who'd come to you and say: “the Bible say that God doesn't exist, look at Ps 14:1 ‘There is no God’!”. Of course this Psalm says the contrary, and it would be easy to prove, just by citing the verse wholly; but what you do is not different, just more subtle.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

No, we were in highschool when we begun to date. But I was already Christian, and we knew I was going to a faculty of theology a few months later to become a pastor.

I'm a member of a united Lutheran-Reformed church. I come from a Reformed parish, but serve nowadays in a Lutheran one, and theologically I navigate between the two traditions.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 1 points 6 days ago (9 children)

I don't know. The Bible don't speak that much after the afterlife. Jesus mainly spoke about the Kingdom, which is within us and not something otherworldly (Luke 17:21), the Old Testament is almost only interested in how to follow God here and now, even the book of Revelation is, if read correctly, more a veiled criticism of the politics of Roman Empire than a prediction. The only one who spoke a lot about the afterlife is Paul, but if he's clear about who will be saved, he's not about who won't. That's why I spoke about a mystery; but I trust God to make the best decision.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As often, the loud minority gives a bad name to the others. People meet a lot of respectful Christians, but doesn't even know they're Christians, as they don't shove it in anyone's throat. They meet a few vocal Christians, and know they're Christians, and then think they're the only ones.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That I could do, if it made sense in the context.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 35 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Do you believe your wife will go to hell?

No. I don't believe in all that “you have to confess Jesus as your personal lord and saviour to avoid hell” crap. It's in fact something not very widespread outside evangelicalism. I believe the Cross is working mysteriously, far outside the frontier of the visible Church. A God who condemns people that doesn't recognize him is not a loving God, it's a pervert. I believe that “to confess Jesus as my personal lord and saviour” is a way to live a better life here and now, and I don't expect an eternal reward for that.

Is she agnostic or does she believe there is no god?

I'd say she's agnostic atheist. She doesn't know if God exist, but believes he does not, and in fact doesn't care.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 14 points 1 week ago

I live in France, where it's illegal to have a religious marriage without having a civil one first. As a pastor, I have to ask a proof that the people I religiously marries are already married civilly. I agree theologically with that, as protestants don't marry people, they bless an already existing marriage.

So we had both. To be honest, in France, civil marriages are quite dull: it takes 5 minutes, the mayor or their deputy reads the law, asks for consent, makes the people sign, and it's the next couple's turn. It's very administrative. There's a little decorum, but just a little.

So, even for people without strong belief, the ritual makes the marriage something special. It was the case for my spouse, at least. She's atheist, but she respects my faith, as I respect her atheism; she knew it was important for me, so that made it important for her.

I would warn you though: if your girlfriend is Catholic, you'll have yo promise to raise your children in the Catholic faith. If your girlfriend is evangelical, they may ask you to testify of your faith. I'd say to discuss this with her first very openly, and test the waters with her priest/pastor. 90% are cool people, with whom you'll be able to be open, and they won't refuse you as long as they don't sense that you opposes the whole thing. 10% are assholes; I'd advice you to look for an other one; if it's the one your girlfriend wants, lie to them (as long as your girlfriend agrees with that). You don't marry for the officiant, you owe them nothing.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No, she never was Christian, nor anything else for that matter.

[–] emmanuelw@jlai.lu 24 points 1 week ago (26 children)

I'm a Christian pastor happily married to an atheist, AMA.

 

Bonjour, j'ai une petite question : comment se fédère le blocage d'un·e utilisateur·rice ? Si je suis sur l'instance A, que je bloque quelqu'un qui est sur l'instance B, est-ce que mes messages publiés sur l'instance C lui seront aussi invisibles ?

 

Image : La couverture du livre, représentant deux formes robotiques (une masculine et une féminine assez sexualisée) sur un sol désertique regardant une machinerie sous une planète et sa lune.

 

Bonjour !

Je suis en train de rédiger un tutoriel pour apprendre les bases de groff + mom.

Le premier brouillon, qui devrait faire une vingtaine de pages et suffit pour appréhender les bases, devrait être bientôt prêt. Y a-t-il un·e lemmynaute prêt·e à relire ce brouillon ? Ce tuto s'adressant à des débutants, aucune compétence technique n'est nécessaire.

Édit : merci à celleux qui m'ont répondu :-) . J'ai pris du retard, j'ai perdu quelques heures de boulot (ça m'apprendra à utiliser des logiciels en bêta, ici HaikuOS, sans faire de bonnes sauvegarde), mais je vous enverrai cette première version bientôt !

 
 
 

Pris d'un accès de nostalgie, j'ai voulu voir si Kraland Interactif (si vous voyez un avertissement c'est normal la version HTTPS n'existe pas), un jeu de rôle en ligne de simulation politique, sur lequel j'ai passé bien des heures à la fin des années 2000 début des années 2010, existait encore.

Et bien oui ! Alors avec un peu plus de 200 joueurs, on est bien loin de l'activité d'il y a 15 ans, mais c'est toujours bien vivant et bien marrant. Je me suis recréé un perso, on verra si je joue sur la durée… mais sans doute qu'avec mon emploi du temps d'adulte, mieux vaut qu'il n'y ait plus autant de messages qu'à la grande époque, ou je ne pourrais plus suivre 😅.

view more: next ›