ember

joined 2 years ago
[–] ember@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

That's bold to assume they will actually be made

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (42 children)

I don't get it. When does it become morally acceptable to block traffic?

Between Just Stop Oil and Stop Arming Israel, they both have equally valid points. So why is it that blocking the Golden Gate Bridge is "based" while blocking various feeder roads in Britain makes you a twat?

Edit: messed up the titles

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There's got to be an 800m wide jawbreaker

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

Just like the good ol' days after 9/11

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago

Stop caring about the opinions of racists.

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago

Testout labsim is where you'll learn all the stuff you need (if you don't just go to youtube). You'll have to order (or redeem) your tests through comptia themselves.

Source: Took the test last year for A+ and Security+

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago

It's like the US's "less than lethal" options in the 70s

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

Another interpretation, and an interesting catch-22, is that they are simultaneously the best and worst contenders for presidency. The act of wanting the presidency warrants at least some ulterior motive, but also requires at least learning how to run a country at the bare minimum. Without the latter, you just can't run a country.

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

Yes and no. On one (nihilistic) hand, you live to die. The other hand (the better one) is that you give your own meaning to live. Fill in the spaces between the living, dying, and suffering parts, to make them seem insufficient in comparison. Just like the time you spent with your cat.

Nothing makes either side any less true - it's all up to interpretation. For your mental health, though, it's better to follow the latter.

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

It could also be the fact that a lot of modern presidents aren't fit for presidency as much as they can mislead the people. In a perfect world, you could've voted for Nader and not regretted it, because you'd have known that the people that surrounded you weren't naive. Personally though, I feel like raeganomics was to blame for too many of America's problems.

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

An agenda for who? I'm very interested in who you think I am.

[–] ember@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Yes. Albeit, I never mentioned anything about speech. It's a bit weird that they immediately jumped to that. I'm mostly mentioning the fact that his senior moments severely outweigh other presidents. I mean, come on. The guy is 81.

I just don't get how people are driven to pick the lesser of two evils when there's much better options out there.

view more: ‹ prev next ›