eleitl

joined 1 month ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Interesting how long an article you can write without mentioning overshoot even once.

 

Pretty shallow view of what is hitting limits of a finite planet.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Not energy. Just electricity. Fossil remains at 80+% of primary energy use.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

What's a reddit?

 

Introduction

Extracting and processing materials is one of the most underappreciated yet powerful forces shaping our world. According to the Global Resources Outlook 2024, over half of global greenhouse gas emissions and 90% of land-use related biodiversity loss stem from resource extraction and processing.1 Yet global material use keeps growing relentlessly. Since 1970, natural resource extraction has more than tripled. Today, the total mass of human-made materials— concrete, steel, plastic and more—has surpassed the weight of all living biomass on Earth.

This deep dive explores the material foundations of our economy and wellbeing—foundations that are both indispensable and increasingly destructive. It highlights how raw materials underpin everything from food and energy to digital communication, and shows how current patterns of overuse, waste, and inequality are pushing us beyond planetary boundaries. It also lays bare the growing geopolitical tensions and environmental justice issues tied to resource dependency and scarcity.

To achieve the five extraordinary turnarounds at the heart of the vision set out in Earth for All: A Survival Guide for Humanity —eliminating poverty, reducing inequality, empowering women, transforming food systems, and realising the energy transition— materials emerge as a unifying thread. This paper explores that connection in greater depth.

This means rethinking how we use resources, shifting from linear “take-make-waste” systems toward circular economies, and ensuring fairer access to materials essential for life and for a sustainable future.

 

Abstract

Projections of tropical rainfall under global warming remain highly uncertain1,2, largely because of an unclear climate response to a potential weakening of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC)3. Although an AMOC slowdown can substantially alter tropical rainfall patterns4,5,6,7,8, the physical mechanisms linking high-latitude changes to tropical hydroclimate are poorly understood11. Here we demonstrate that an AMOC slowdown drives widespread shifts in tropical rainfall through the propagation of high-latitude cooling into the tropical North Atlantic. We identify and validate this mechanism using climate model simulations and palaeoclimate records from Heinrich Stadial 1 (HS1)—a past period marked by pronounced AMOC weakening9,10. In models, prevailing easterly and westerly winds communicate the climate signal to the Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean through the transport of cold air generated over the tropical and subtropical North Atlantic. Air–sea interactions transmit the response across the Pacific Ocean and Indian Ocean, altering rainfall patterns as far as Indonesia, the tropical Andes and northern Australia. A similar teleconnection emerges under global warming scenarios, producing a consistent multi-model pattern of tropical hydroclimatic change. These palaeo-validated projections show widespread drying across Mesoamerica, the Amazon and West Africa, highlighting an elevated risk of severe drought for vulnerable human and ecological systems.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago
 

Abstract

Global estimates of methane (CH4) emissions from lakes to the atmosphere rely on understanding CH4 processes at the sediment-water interface (SWI). However, in the Arctic, the variability, magnitude, and environmental drivers of CH4 production and flux across the SWI are poorly understood. Here, we estimate CH4 diffusive fluxes from the sediment into the water column in 10 lakes in Arctic Scandinavia and Svalbard using porewater modeling and mass transfer estimates, which we then compare with 60 published estimates from the Arctic to the tropics. Diffusion of CH4 in the sampled lake sediments ranged from −0.46 to 3.1 mmol m−2 day−1, which is consistent with previous reports for Arctic and boreal lakes, and lower than for temperate and tropical biomes. Methane production occurs primarily within the top ∼10 cm of sediment, indicating a biogenic origin. Random forest predictive modeling of the sampled lakes revealed that conditions promoting production and deposition of autochthonous organic carbon in Arctic lakes drive CH4 diffusion into the water column by fueling sediment CH4 production. For small lakes across biomes, determinants of the estimated CH4 flux were also best captured by climate predictors, with warmer and wetter conditions favoring ecosystem productivity and enhancing flux but also lake morphometry resulting in important regional variability in estimates. Our study emphasizes the importance of quantifying diffusive CH4 fluxes from sediments in diverse lake types to account for differences in the controls on primary production and the preservation of organic carbon across and within different biomes, to refine CH4 emission estimates in a warming climate. Plain Language Summary

Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas. Lakes in the Arctic release large amounts of methane to the atmosphere, which increases global warming. This study explores how methane moves from the sediments (accumulated layers of mud and organic matter) of Arctic lakes, where it is produced, into the overlying water. We find that most lakes release methane from their sediments, with some lakes having higher-than-expected methane levels, especially further north. The results from our advanced data analysis techniques suggest that carbon content in the water and sediment, lake depth and size, and latitude and elevation all influence methane production and release. Overall, we highlight the need to study methane dynamics from a wider variety of lakes to better understand and predict how methane is produced and released in different environments.

Key Points

We quantified the diffusive methane flux and determined the depth of biogenic methane production in the sediments of 10 Arctic lakes

Regional methane flux variability in Arctic lakes relates to production and preservation of autochthonous organic matter

Lake morphometry and climate are important predictors of methane diffusive flux from the sediment for small lakes across biomes
 

Abstract

Plastic pollution of the marine realm is widespread, with most scientific attention given to macroplastics and microplastics1,2. By contrast, ocean nanoplastics (<1 μm) remain largely unquantified, leaving gaps in our understanding of the mass budget of this plastic size class3,4,5. Here we measure nanoplastic concentrations on an ocean-basin scale along a transect crossing the North Atlantic from the subtropical gyre to the northern European shelf. We find approximately 1.5–32.0 mg m−3 of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) nanoplastics throughout the entire water column. On average, we observe a 1.4-fold higher concentration of nanoplastics in the mixed layer when compared with intermediate water depth, with highest mixed-layer nanoplastic concentrations near the European continent. Nanoplastic concentrations at intermediate water depth are 1.8-fold higher in the subtropical gyre compared with the open North Atlantic outside the gyre. The lowest nanoplastic concentrations, with about 5.5 mg m−3 on average and predominantly composed of PET, are present in bottom waters. For the mixed layer of the temperate to subtropical North Atlantic, we estimate that the mass of nanoplastic may amount to 27 million tonnes (Mt). This is in the same range or exceeding previous budget estimates of macroplastics/microplastics for the entire Atlantic6,7 or the global ocean1,8. Our findings suggest that nanoplastics comprise the dominant fraction of marine plastic pollution.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 days ago

While this will happen eventually, and circumvention takes skills, it is fundamentally possible, for motivated individuals.

4
The Crisis Report - 114 (richardcrim.substack.com)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In Germany they won't cut off your Internet connection. They'll send you a cease and desist for a few thousand euros.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 19 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Just use a VPN then.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 15 points 5 days ago

Haven't seen any age verification in BGP.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 days ago

Hard to see how any country is going to let https://www.marineregions.org/gazetteer.php?p=details&id=8326 go to waste. Artificial islands have been maintained for less.

7
Deep Sea Delusions (thehonestsorcerer.substack.com)
[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Dark Forest is not self consistent. Ability to travel implies nanotechnology which allows metabolizing any resource which deterministically leads to expansion which leads to self-selection for fastest expanders which soon means relativistic expansion which is hard to observe since observation window is short while pre-expansive observers are extinguished. Alernative is that nucleation density is very low and/or (reaching the stage of) travel and expansion is impossible. This is consistent with what we see, so Occam's razor cuts Dark Forest.

[–] eleitl@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago

Are you tired of winning yet?

view more: next ›