eezeebee

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fleurety. This vocalist did permanent damage to his vocal chords.

https://youtu.be/aYimUNtWLd8?si=WiXnErMTnFC5317M

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

Don't forget the parts where we get to watch the dust settle

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Booting up Chrono Cross on the PS2 and just letting it sit on the intro screen so that it would play this intro song/video:

https://youtu.be/180sjeAMKPE?si=xzCgezXqkF546s9h

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 42 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I agree. It's very subjective and depends who you are talking to.

I'm somewhat wary of calling myself an atheist, because I am not necessarily against religion (unless it is harming others - otherwise I think it can help some people, and that is great), even though I don't follow any myself. Some people may interpret the term as being against it, and that is the case for some atheists, of course. But I do identify with the term more than agnostic, because while I acknowledge I can never know for sure, personally I am very doubtful.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Religious people see religious behavior even where there is no supernatural god involved. In their eyes, the god of an atheist soccer fan is soccer, and they see much of his behavior as just as religious as theirs.

When you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail. To the atheist soccer fan, they're enjoying the sport, but I think it's a stretch to say they are enjoying it to the extent of "worship" in the same way a Christian does God. Even the most religious people I've known were allowed to enjoy things, watch sports, , appreciate good food, etc. and it was fine if they didn't "put it before God".

In OP's case we don't know if they have any ties to a religion, so I suppose that context is what matters most to answer their question. To me, an atheist, they are not being religious by believing science. To a fundamental Christian, that belief in science could be enough to say they are in service of a false god.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago
[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago (4 children)

The key concept here is belief without understanding.

That's part of it, but not all of it.

If you look at definitions of religious:

having a strong belief in a god or gods

a · the service and worship of God or the supernatural ; b · belief in or devotion to religious faith or observance ; c · the state of a person in the religious life.

Belief in science does not require a belief in a god or gods.

It does not require the worship of god or the "supernatural" - a healthy fascination is plenty, but optional.

It does not require devotion to anything.

Science is the best we can explain the world around us, and if old theories are proven wrong, it's not infallible- we simply accept new knowledge with an open mind. Religion tends to do the opposite and deny it.

So no, you may or may not be religious, but a belief in science has nothing to do with it.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 32 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A LOT more suicide cases probably

Lots of people constantly rerolling, waiting to get born into a rich family before committing to a full round of life.

[–] eezeebee@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 years ago

I usually fish for smallmouth bass and they end up teasing me

view more: ‹ prev next ›