edinbruh

Wait, is it on a population of 5000 computers? Bruh, why are we even looking at this?

But it's so cool! It looks like some brutalist paranormal manifestation. Like, I bet the distorted part of the oldest house (from the game Control) looked like this from the outside.

Didn't the onion protocol already do something like that?

My grandma has one, and her mother was German. Coincidences?

When they finish the words with G they can just add another layer of recursion and create BIG, an acronym for "BIG Is GNU". And from there go on like a word chain game

In my dialect "tegon" means huge dick. Or sometimes a strong slap.

On Windows, Nvidia without thinking twice. On Linux, depends, on rDNA 4 and the next release of Nvidia drivers, but probably still Nvidia.

Unfortunately, despite how much I would rather buy from someone else, AMD's products are just inferior, especially software.

Examples of AMD being worse:

• AMD's implementation of opengl is a joke, the open source implementation used on Linux is several times faster and made for free by volunteers, without internal knowledge
• AMD will never run physx, which is every day less relevant, but if AMD from the past had proposed an alternative we would have a standardized physics extension in DirectX by now, like with dlss
• AMD's ray accelerators are "incomplete" compared to Nvidia RT cores, which is why ray tracing is better on Nvidia, and which is why with rDNA 4 they are changing how they work
• GCN was terrible and very different from Nvidia's architecture, it was hard to optimize for both. rDNA is more similar, but now AMD has a plethora of old junk to maintain compatible with rDNA
• Nvidia has been constantly investing in new software technologies (nowadays it's mainly AI), AMD didn't and now it's always playing catch up

AMD also has its wins, for example:

• They often make their stuff open source, mainly because it's convenient for its underdog position
• Has a pretty good software stack on Linux (much better than on windows) partly because it's not entirely done by them
• Nvidia has been a bad faith actor for many years on the Linux space, even if it's in its redemption arc
• Modern GPU seems to be catching up in compute performance
• AMD is less greedy with VRAM, mainly because they are less at risk of competing with their own enterprise lineup
• Current Nvidia's prices are stupid

I would still prefer Nvidia right now, but maybe it's gonna change with the next releases.

P.s. I have used a GTX 1060, an RX 480, and a Vega 56

Who the hell does that?

The USB protocol was simple by design, so it could be implemented in small dumb devices like pen drives. More specifically, it used two couples of cables, one couple was for power and the other for data (four wires in total). Having a single half-duplex data line means you need some way of arbitrating who can send data at any time. The easiest way to do it is having a single machine that decides who gets to send data (master), and the easiest way to decide the master is to not do it and have the computer always do the master. This means you couldn't connect two computers together because they would both try to be the master.

I used the past tense because you may have noticed that micro USB have 5 pins and not 4, that's because phones are computers and they use the 5th pin to decide how to behave. If it's grounded they act as a slave (the male micro to male A cable grounds it). If it has a resistor (the otg cable has it) it act as master. And if the devices are connected with a wire on that pin (on some special micro to micro) they negotiate the connection.

When they made usb 3.0 and they realized that not having the 5th wire on the usb-A was stupid, so they put it (along side some extra data lines) that's why they have an odd number of wires. So with usb 3 you can connect computers together, but you need a special cable that uses the negotiation wire. Also I don't know what software you need for it to work.

Usb-c is basically two USB 3.0 in the same cable, so you can probably connect computers with that. But often the port on the devices only uses one, so it might not be faster. Originally they put the pins for two connections so you could flip the connector, but later they realized they could use them to get double speed.

Yeah that would be terrible, imagine if you were to run some updates and the package manager went like "Get Pro! You will get better updates and support"

Me:

1. make the snapshot after the system is already broken
2. Break it more
3. Don't restore the snapshot because its old and you can fix it

All the details I have are in the issue, it's from me. I have also reported it to kde through Konqi and to fedora through GnomeAbrt