ech

joined 1 month ago
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Excellent cover. Thanks for sharing!

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 100 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Hey now, he earned those fair and square off the corpses he killed.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

They did take them, and then were passed when their test was checked because the answers are specifically ambiguous, made to be able to fail or pass anyone at the discretion of the testing authority.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

"It bilds karacter!"

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It's wild how relatable it still is nearly 30 years later.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago
[–] ech@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Seems like a good place to remind everybody in the US to watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Well, they are already the home of Big Brother, so this is fitting.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You read the article title, knew the topic, (assumedly) know the show, and still dug further. That's on you, mate. Also, it's much more reddit-y to doom scroll the politics community to "relax".

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

Evidence directly from the suspect(s) is basically a confession. Gender has nothing to do with it.

[–] ech@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (8 children)

How does "We wouldn't need [evidence] if society just trusted women" fit your argument?

view more: ‹ prev next ›