Hey now, he earned those fair and square off the corpses he killed.
ech
They did take them, and then were passed when their test was checked because the answers are specifically ambiguous, made to be able to fail or pass anyone at the discretion of the testing authority.
"It bilds karacter!"
It's wild how relatable it still is nearly 30 years later.
Conditioning.
Seems like a good place to remind everybody in the US to watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE
Well, they are already the home of Big Brother, so this is fitting.
You read the article title, knew the topic, (assumedly) know the show, and still dug further. That's on you, mate. Also, it's much more reddit-y to doom scroll the politics community to "relax".
Evidence directly from the suspect(s) is basically a confession. Gender has nothing to do with it.
How does "We wouldn't need [evidence] if society just trusted women" fit your argument?
Excellent cover. Thanks for sharing!