dynamo

joined 2 years ago
[–] dynamo@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

shit solution, spend more money to fix a design fuckup

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Not american, can't try without importing

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Your choice. Personally, i h8 almonds

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

can't get a phone for 5$

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

The way i understand it, they ditch the jack so they can sell ppl their earbuds while claiming it's about the environment. No idea if that's true, but i don't really care about this angle. Also, regarding the IP rating, you could add a rubber flap over it, pretty sure some CAT phones had that. Still, my biggest gripe is the jack situation, though a secondary sim slot and a smaller screen would be nice.

Personally, the best phone for me, that i know of, would be a Galaxy XCover 5 - small, durable, removable battery, jack, dedicated microsd slot and dualsim. Shame it doesn't support any variant of degoogled android.

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Never said it was. Still, i'd rather ditch milk / "milk" then switch to "milk". Unless they could synthesize it instead

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago (6 children)

All this accomplishes is an unnecessary inconvenience. I shouldn't have to lug additional cables, and far more importantly the choice between Wired/Wireless should be up to me, not the manufacturer

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

You also don't get a noticeable delay on the audio, which imo makes watching any video horrible

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Don't have many options if i need the headphone jack

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 9 points 2 years ago (3 children)

How is removing the jack making the device more sustainable or reliable?

[–] dynamo@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago

wasn't it the 2nd?

view more: ‹ prev next ›