Netcraft confirms it!
duncesplayed
joined 2 years ago
I had a very realistic visual hallucination once (hypnopompic). I was coming out of a nap while I had a fever. I looked over, and beside the bed was a young woman staring at me intently. She leaned over to bite/eat me, but calmly and without any emotion. As soon as she got within touching distance of me, she started to vanish, from the centre-out, and within a couple seconds was totally gone.
I was really struck by how real she seemed. She looked exactly like a real person.
But I just knew she wasn't real (the same way that you just know things in dreams). Because of that, I didn't find it scary at all. I remember being a little curious what kind of sensations I would "feel" when she actually made contact with me, and was a mixture of disappointed/relieved when she vanished at that point. But strangely(?) not scared.
Can't have a privilege escalation when there are no privileges, since every process runs in the same address space in ring 0.
Except for the fact that testing began before release, this is totally accurate.
I should try this manoeuvre when my friends need help with something.
Here's what I think you're asking about: Move all your furniture this weekend. Is that correct?
Yes
No
We will see!
Traditionally it's been a day for young people to go out partying and clubbing in costumes.
But last year 67 people were crushed to death and we had an official week-long period of mourning. We will see how Halloween is treated this year.
This isn't just the same guy that's released the other videos: it's the original video. I don't know why this community has been flooded with year-old posts.
I don't know that this one really counts. First, as stewie said, Edison didn't electrocute Topsy (though he did film it).
But anyway, what "stupid prizez" did Edison win? An enormous pile of money and immortal fame and admiration?
Assuming you're a man, 32 is definitely not too old. In my personal experience as a 40-something, 32 is right around your peak.
Are you hot? If the answer is "no", that's fine. Most of us aren't. But it means that you'll have to do a little bit more work in figuring out what kind of people (women?) are attracted to you, why they're attracted to, and what might be the best way to meet them. The answer may not be Tinder.
Any algorithm can be O(n^2) if you only want it to be occasionally right.
\except $for $the $annoying $syntax $and $bad $function $naming, $it's $actually $turned $into $a $fairly $decent $language->
Yeah thanks for the COVID-19 there, buddy.