IMHO it risks making (new) people think that it's the official logo that you've parodied and creating that association in their mind.
drspod
joined 3 years ago
This same article has already been posted 3 times to this community:
Please check if you're reposting before clicking submit!
Why would you want to legitimize Meta's attempt at appropriating the Fediverse by paying homage to their logo?
Anyone who falls for the scam of thinking that you can determine IQ from the genome of an embryo is probably below average themselves.
You're just unabashedly supporting eugenics? Is that because you're too young, or too uneducated to know any better?
Did you read the article?
If you think that I'm misunderstanding something and arguing from a false premise then please feel free to engage with the discussion.
I thought passkeys were supposed to be a hardware device?
This is typical embrace/extend/extinguish behavior from the large platforms that don't want their web-SSO hegemony challenged because it would mean less data collection and less vendor lock-in.
The whole idea of passkeys provided by an online platform should have been ruled out by the specification. It completely defeats the purpose of passkeys which is that the user has everything they need to authenticate themself.
They didn't break RSA.
Please don't continue to recommend Ventoy. It has serious and unanswered security questions hanging over it, and the developer seems to be completely AWOL.
https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/issues/2795
https://lemmy.ml/post/20404494