drathvedro

joined 2 years ago
[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes but a well placed himars strike can turn 100 russians into 0

A well placed nuke can turn 3 mil Ukrainians into 0. What's the point?

The reason Russia is taking ground at all is because they just have more meat than Ukraine has bullets.

Well that's kind of the point. Even if you turn the question that way, as long as Russia has more troops than Ukrainians have bullets, it is still winning. It is set up to be a Pyrrhic victory from day 1, but a victory nonetheless.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee -1 points 5 months ago

blah-blah-blah

My brother in christ, get a hold of yourself. Winning is winning. If I beat you up in a boxing match and shit my pants in the process, it doesn't matter how shitty my pants were, you go down then you're losing.

For your info, ukraine still hasnt issued any draft of its people.

Are you NUTS?

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Those are, in fact, good points, I just didn't want to yap about them in the previous comment.

The battlefield has, indeed, got quite stale with rare opportunistic gains or those that were gained through massive bloodshed. Trench warfare is once again the reality of modern war. Still, even with all the aid Ukraine has received the tide isn't going in their favor.

So, to put it shortly - on the battlefield, technology can cancel out numerical advantages of 3.5 to 4 quite realistically.

I stand ground on my conviction that there is no 4x force multiplier, solely by the fact that whatever Ukraine deploys could be also deployed by Russia. Most definitely a somewhat shittier version, but which gets the job done, maybe giving the Ukraine's side at most 2X advantage, but most importantly, magnitudes cheaper.

Economically - Ukraine alone would not sustain production against Russia, but Ukraine happens to have EU in its back yard. The Russian economy is actually quite small compared to EU’s economy. So the economic unbalance can also be canceled out.

Considering the point above, I wouldn't be so sure about that given that we are... well, were for the past year in that position with the only difference of it being the US who's providing most of the (military) aid rather than EU... and the front line is moving westwards nonetheless

As for attrition on Russia - if you observe the footage and news, you will notice that they are low on cars, low on armor (and using a large percent of antiquated armor), and low on artillery barrels. Out of the USSR stockpile of ~13 000 tanks, estimated losses were recently standing at 9859 machines [1].

Cars are def not a problem, the streets in Russia are absolutely flooded by Chinese imports. Tanks, artillery, and warships, from what I gather from some military analysts, and this will most likely sound controversial and so we'll probably have to agree to disagree, is that those are basically entirely antiquated already by the advent of drone warfare. Armor shortages sounds surprising to me and I haven't heard about that... I don't see how it could problem for Russia, and yet it is... Corruption is the only possible answer I could see for that. But overall, even given that those are in fact necessary, as I've said, Russia still has a ton of economy not turned towards the war machine, and there's a lot of factories to tap into to ramp the military production if necessary.

And please don't take it as me praising Russia. Putin is definitely in wrong here and Zelensky has all the moral high ground there could possibly be. I just see that many news sources blow out any small Ukrainian achievements out of proportion into some kind of twisted Good vs Evil, David vs Goliath stories. And it makes my blood boil as it leaves an impression of "Why help Ukrainians even more when they're doing quite well already", while hundreds of innocent people are killed and displaced every day and it isn't stopping, and won't stop, unless a drastic measure is taken.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)

There are at least four links leading to AI tools in this page. Why would you link something when you complain about it?

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 18 points 5 months ago (5 children)

This post is literally an ad for AI tools.

No, thanks. Call me when they actually get good. As it stands, they only offer marginally better autocomplete.

I should probably start collecting dumb AI suggestions and gaslighting answers to show the next time I encounter this topic...

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You mean, the watches from each other, the keyboard from mice, keyboard/mouse from the watches?

...All of them?

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

We usually just dump a whole load SHOW CREATE TABLE dumps into drawsql at work when we discuss database migrations, and then drop a bunch of "tables" with no columns as comments. I am not aware of an tool that could deal with procedures and such, but we've only looked at that, SQLyog and Intellij's built-in visualizers.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The marketing stunt came to a halt after just one day when the security guard noticed the metal frame of the glass case had been weakened from the constant barrage of physical pressure.

** Kickproof™ is a trademark name of 3M Corporation. ~all~ ~kicks~ ~are~ ~performed~ ~by~ ~trained~ ~professionals;~ ~not~ ~resistant~ ~to~ ~kicking;~ ~consult~ ~with~ ~your~ ~doctor~ ~before~ ~trying~

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

Well, what I meant is that, with such shallow requirements, they already have pretext to bully practically anyone. They can just look at banking history and declare anyone who has any foreign transfers, or transfers from anyone who has any, a foreign agent. That's already almost anyone in Russia covered. Those who don't live in Russia are already foreign agents by default. The only category of people it doesn't really cover is people living in Russia but using cash only.

[–] drathvedro@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago

It's ромрец

view more: ‹ prev next ›