doubtingtammy

joined 1 year ago
[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

Lemmy.world is pro genocide

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The article has lots of reasons why maybe not. Not using Martian material is one of them.

But moss typically doesn't need soil. The first mosses evolved on earth before soil was a thing. Mosses don't have roots that extract nutrients/water from soil. Instead, they have rhizoids that just kinda anchor them in place, but don't transport nutrients/water

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the genocide in Gaza broke a lot liberals' brains. Something snapped. The mask is off. Leftists are the enemy. Dissent must be crushed. Everyone they disagree with is a troll/bot/Russian/Chinese

The old world is dying and the new world struggles to be born. Now is the time of monsters

❤️ To you, though. Not everyone is like this. Not even all libs are this callous. But it is a growing trend 😞

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

I'm surprised they didn't also mention the climate of fear and distrust around Chinese academics in the US. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/asian-america/wrongfully-accused-spying-china-professor-wins-appeal-sue-government-rcna86109

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Every warmonger to ever exist:

Naturally war is bad, but

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

That's like 1-2 urban highway interchanges

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

How were they attacked? I missed that part

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Look at the article, though. IMO it looks like HHS was trying to keep quiet, navigating political pressure and recent research. It's the NYT that decided to box the administration into this very public position. It's effective Advocacy journalism for terfs

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Neither subtext nor empathy are yours

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, this is a rare application of LLMs that kinda makes sense. It's essentially just rephrasing text based on statistics. That's what LLMs are good at, and it's pretty low stakes if it gets something wrong.

There's definitely an ick factor, considering all the problems with "AI", like exploiting labor and wasting energy. But this is exactly the sort of things LLMs can do well. Rephrasing things.

Would it be better to just get a human to do this? Yes. They already do with abridged versions and cliff notes. Best case scenario, this service is using LLMs to just make these people's jobs easier (doubtful, I know)

[–] doubtingtammy@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

The Exxon defender has logged on

view more: ‹ prev next ›