dgerard

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 1 hour ago

I have no hope. The guy who introduced me to LessWrong included what I later realised was a race science pitch. Yudkowsky was pushing this shit in 2007. This sucker just realised a coupla decades late.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 3 days ago

nah. Sam's a monorail salesman who knows how to say the AI doomer buzzwords.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 3 days ago

Is there any detail on any of this, beyond an announcement?

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 7 points 3 days ago

look, that sounds like a "this afternoon" problem

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

enterprise code is already shit and vibe coding has made it worse, if they train on this the model collapse should be glorious

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 2 points 4 days ago

oh yeah they're going all out

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

where was this?

 

despite the error of postulating that Luigi was there for the CEO's coincidental bullet-involved collision, when he was at bible study with me, and you

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 4 points 5 days ago

and the budget for fixing literally every frame afterwards, as with their previous demos

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

also, I was at Bible study with Luigi at the time a CEO coincidentally had a bullet-involved collision, as were you

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] dgerard@awful.systems 12 points 1 week ago (10 children)

i actually got hold of a review copy of this

(using the underhand scurvy weasel trick of asking for one)

that was two weeks ago and i still haven't opened it lol

better get to that, sigh

this review has a number of issues (he liked HPMOR) but the key points are clear: bad argument, bad book, don't bother

view more: next ›