I’d like to see them hire some formal methods people to at least formally verify crucial parts of it.
It might actually also be good to analyze it with an LLM to identify any hidden problem areas.
I’m interested to hear why my idea is probably foolish as well, though.
Documentary filmmaker Sharmeen Obaid-Chinoy is due to make her narrative feature debut with the project
Mark my words: they GUARANTEE that it will be bad by hiring a first time director that has previously only worked in documentaries for a movie with a budget this big. How can they STILL keep making these unforced errors with billion dollar franchises?
No problem. I may actually auto-post his stuff on here every time he posts it using a bot if you’re ok with that. I do it on my other communities and it is much more reliable than I am. ;)
Ok.
To answer your rant: Morals are a social construct and can change based on situation. In other words: Just because something is illegal doesn’t mean it’s wrong.
I didn’t see where you asked us to write a paragraph where one word would suffice….But, I suppose I can write you a few more sentences to appease you.
Yes violence is sometimes the only answer.
Edit: in response to your original, much better title (that was 100% likely censored by the neolib respectability police running world.)
Thanks! I can’t take credit. Here’s the person who created it:
https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rg1024_Camera_Lens.svg
I brought it into Inkscape and took out the text:
Look into one Mr. Frank Grillo for all of the things you seek.
Doesn’t the new Chinese model just released actually do abstract reasoning?
To my untrained self, that sounds like reasoning.