I don't see a scenario where google or the likes would be allowed to fail. So moot point.
Hypothetically it would open a window for open source services to sneak in.
I don't see a scenario where google or the likes would be allowed to fail. So moot point.
Hypothetically it would open a window for open source services to sneak in.
Middle term? The phasing out of personal computers, and moving toward a system of servers/terminals where noone owns software.
You'll rent computing power or storage space, you'll only pay for the interface.
AI fear is going to be the trojan horse for even harsher and stupider 'intellectual property' laws.
A few things. How do we know it's going to be Pegasus? How do you know the price, why is it so expensive (and why would anyone assume it to stay so)?
Because if it actually is Pegasus, the main problem with this bill isn't surveillance (although it is most definitely a problem),
but the tacit endorsement of this unregulated infoweapon.
As the poet said: doubleplusungood.
This isn’t going to be regularly used.
(눈‸눈)
Isn't the whole point of AI decision making to provide plausible deniability for these sort of things?
For Instagram. Threads is banned in the EU as far as I know.
I don't know how they'll deal with California's CCPA.
Social media is a tool of state surveillance and manipulation. Why wouldn't it be legal?
https://gdpr.eu/right-to-erasure-request-form/
It's cumbersome and annoying, but they'll have to honor it.
Why wait?
I mean what did you expect, you came to their place and insulted them.