dbilitated
I just made a github action that merges anything updated in master into feature branches automatically. you get pinged if there's a conflict but the automerge keeps drift to a minimum so it's less common and fixed sooner.
better than merging poorly tested/reviewed code.
and yeah, a small team of superstars doesn't need reviews so much, but most teams have a range of devs with different levels of experience and time working with particular parts of a large codebase. Someone more senior or more expert derisks people picking up tickets and improves code quality.
it also leads to plenty of good conversations about the best way to implement, so overall it's a win.
Tony Abbott still reckons it doesn't exist. we'll keep arguing until we're extinct
faulty hardware is to blame for hardware faults? omg
microscope is actually such a great idea, or binoculars
The best kind of correct.
on the one hand, yes, I write software and take showers when I'm stumped because it's a great way to think through it.
on the other hand the world didn't need an article about it.
beautiful kids π
why is the internet attacking me
as replied elsewhere, yeah I agree that's insanely irresponsible, but we didn't know that until now.
oh, it was the Catholic church then?