db0

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (44 children)

Quotes from the thread:

Not sure which thread you mean, but If you think people expressing their low opinions about someone is "bullying", then, well you haven't experienced bullying. And also, what the hell do you expect of dbzer0 admins to do about people expressing such opinions? You want us to go around protecting the people you like from public opinion? Like, this is a legit absurd argument path.

Those aren't the only two options lol. I'm just saying that "Our users/tribe love that we always take the side of our users/tribe no matter the facts of the situation!"

It's easy to look right when fighting against strawmen.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (14 children)

People say this stuff and then claim that we're doing bad faith takes. Go figure.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

We really don't use votes for yptb. We have specific keywords if one wants to tally. Likewise actual voting happens in our governance comm, and our actual users seem to be onboard with what we've been doing consistently

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (46 children)

Honestly, I think calling what's ongoing "bullying" is kinda strange. If anything we wanted to cool the situation down.

This was pretty much my point. lemmy.ml and Hexbear love how their admins behave, and that's all the admins feel like they need to know. My point was that (a) you're starting to operate along the same lines, it looks like, and (b) that's not always a good thing.

I would rather show me which admins are more centered on what every rando on the internet thinks. Then I can point you to someone about to have a burnout.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago (16 children)

Feel free to make a ytpb post about it and we can see what people think about such mods

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes people seem to forget that the world is going to hell in a hsndbasket, naturally a lot of people are having way less patience than before

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (65 children)

I disagree with your framing. I think you're being dishonest in your framing on what caused the mod actions. At the end of the day we and Ada are beholden to our respective users, and as it turns out, they think those were the right choices.

And yes, we're going to take action about harassment of our own users, that's the duty of an instance admin. I want to point out however that all this brouhaha is over a 7days ban. Literally the mildest of punishments ever, and you're at the point of pondering what's rotten in the whole instance and writing walls of text, over a short term "chill out" ban.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (86 children)

Ye, we obviously can have some acerbic users as well, can't avoid it 12k registrations. But if someone is too toxic consistently, we tend to get rid of them. Still doesn't make the instance tankie thought 😅

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (201 children)

They are not normally tankies

What, in your opinion, makes us "tankies" from what you just said? Respect for the neopronouns, intolerance towards Genai-hater trolls, or mod actions towards someone who went on a harassment campaign towards one of our users?

Anarchists always had very similar critiques towards capitalism as Marxists. Where we differ is what we do about it, and these actions is what can label someone a "tankie"

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

This stinks of astroturfing

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

3 mods for 12k active users? This is not nearly enough imho

17
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/fediverse@piefed.social
 

Cross-posted from "We have to solve the money problem!" by @blenderdumbass@lm.madiator.cloud in !opensource@lemmy.ml


Personal note: 5K a month is absolutely absurd for 17 MAU. lemmy.world does that at 1/10 the cost. /0 could probably handle it as is, or maybe with some small increases. Likewise, we have enough donations to cover our infra costs since day 0, and I'm terrible at outreach! I don't know what they're hosting on, but this also sounds self-inflicted to some extent.

 

Hey m@tes, a new lemmy version just dropped which adds some really good improvements, so it's time for a quick upgrade. Things I like particularly is finally emailing rejections and displaying rejection reasons in the UI.

Let us know if you experience any issues

 

Cross-posted from "Liberals right now..." by @return2ozma@lemmy.world in !politicalmemes@lemmy.world


 

Cross-posted from "For Saturday protests" by @seahorse@midwest.social in !ohio@midwest.social


 

Hey m@tes, as y'all know, this instance has been anti-corporate GenAI positive since it's creation and as such we've typically allowed such content to be posted freely. However in the last few weeks we've had a bunch of drama from GenAI haters who insist on coming into our comms and starting slap-fights. This caused us to vote on a new rule to have the mandate to clear out this constant friction. This worked to an extent, but I think we can help foster a better community with the larger threadiverse.

One issue a lot of anti-GenAI people keep bringing is that while they can block dedicated comms like !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com, they don't have an easy option to avoid GenAI content in random other /0 comms as there's no way to filter it out. This kind of content has been seen to cause a lot of strife, because people complain about its existence, while /0 admins and mods based on the above rule, tend to sanction those complaining. This then causes drama loops with /c/YPTB and /c/FuckAI etc.

There is a good point to be made here that while we don't mind GenAI content in /0, there isn't a reason to not help others avoid it. So we want to institute the following soft rule by now:

Simply tag your posts which consist of primarily GenAI content with the [GenAI] tag in their title. Not only will frontends like Tesseract will natively parse this as a tag and display it accordingly, but people who dislike such content, can simply filter it out of their feeds. Eventually lemmy will add tags which will make this tagging more seamless, but for now a manual tag in the title will suffice.

This rule only applies to posts in non-explicit GenAI comms. The assumption is that people can simply block those comms completely anyway.

As I said, this is a soft rule for now. Soft in the sense that you're not going to be sanctioned for forgetting it, but we hope people will remind you to do so. This is a good-faith attempt by us to co-exist and help others avoid what they don't want to stumble onto, much like [NSFW] tags. So I hope you'll add do a good faith attempt to help us in this. Furthermore, people who come to posts tagged as GenAI explicitly to scold and start slap-fights, will give the admins and easier justification to clean up, since they could have just filtered out that content in the first place.

Cheers

 

Cross-posted from "Nina going off today" by @seahorse@midwest.social in !antifascism@midwest.social


 

Cross-posted from "Deep in Mordor where the shadows lie: Dystopian tales of that time when I sold out to Google" by @mirrorwitch@awful.systems in !techtakes@awful.systems


Memoirs of the almost a year I lasted at Google. The name of that year? 2008. Yeah. Topics include: Third World, precariat, tech elitism, queerness, surveillance, capitalism.

Y'all encouraged me to submit this as a full post, and I clearly overcommited to this blog so I hope TechTakes fits for it lol

 

New functionality can be configured through two new .env vars. You can use this functionality to deny things like known spam or potentially abuse of the registration form. In our instance for example we use it to autoblock people who put a word we explicitly say they shouldn't mention.

view more: ‹ prev next ›