daniyeg

joined 2 years ago
[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 year ago

This ps5 almost feels like a waste of 500 bucks

that's cause it is

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

the game basically encourages taxing the rich more because of the way it handles SoL, so this strategy is OP, as it should be.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

still playing the longest journey. it's been a very long journey indeed i wonder if I'll see the end of it this week.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it says it's using a quantitative model like all the other trading bots, not chatgpt. people were using machine learning models for trading long before gpt 4 but since the "AI" boom now everything has to be labelled AI or AI-powered.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i wish the game had better snapping options for roads and buildings. why are all the surveyors drunk 5 year olds? did no one discover right angles or parallel lines in this universe???

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Old School Runescape. it's too long to "100%" though it has insane grinds, but it's fun once you get it.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

first john woke took female characters with big breasts out of video games, and now he's taking another pillar of american society as well? someone stop this madness.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

that nutsack feels a little bit excessive. wouldn't the truck stop in pain after passing over a speed bump or two?

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

unfortunately for them the Gamer bullshit is so repetitive all their videos feel the same. honestly why nothing changes in the gaming industry? at some point enough's gotta be enough.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

still playing the longest journey. it's been very long indeed although im not sure about if it'll be the longest or not. i just have to see.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

average non political G*mer.

[–] daniyeg@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

no it's probably only for shareholders. they have to make "AI" seem useful in order to keep the bull run on their stock going. this one is probably gonna get filed under "a dozen new AI products revolutionising how we interact with our computers" in the next quarterly report.

view more: ‹ prev next ›