What do you actually want to know, here? How we should approach or treat allies who aren't "fully" pro-trans? It might help to expand a little on ways they are imperfect allies, since context makes such a big difference.
For example, an ally that is "live and let live" but doesn't think trans women are really women is a different situation than an ally who believes trans women are women but who has "concerns" about minors having access to gender-affirming care like puberty blockers, and both of those are different than an ally who is not sure they understand non-binary identities or struggles with using they/them pronouns for someone but is trying anyway, and so on.
I think Ada's response was excellent, but was focused on justifying the Blahaj Zone's no tolerance moderation policy, and I'm not sure that's what you wanted to discuss or not.
This article might be a starting point:
https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/the-moderate-case-against-trans-youth
this is such a great response, and thank you for all the work you do to create a safe space ๐ฅฐ๐๐