dactylotheca

joined 1 year ago
[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 22 points 1 year ago (9 children)

It's a bit unclear how any of what you're proposing is supposed to help

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 10 points 1 year ago

Oh I wish it was cool, it's been so hot lately but I guess that's how it's going to be from here on out.

^Definitely^ ^not^ ^selling^ ^weapons-grade^ ^LSD^

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Could always sell drugs.

^For^ ^legal^ ^purposes^ ^this^ ^comment^ ^is^ ^a^ ^joke.^ ^Don't^ ^sell^ ^drugs.^ ^Drugs^ ^are^ ^bad.^

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But surely you can't be suggesting that the homeless man should be housed for free, so that someone who has contributed so much to society has to bear the costs?

Maybe we should let the free markets decide: first, the criminal should sign a completely voluntary contract which specifies that his new owner is entitled to assign to him any work they deem a suitable compensation for his upkeep during his sentence (not signing the contract or shirking work duties leads to a doubling of the sentence and immediate transfer to an isolation cell for the remainder of his sentence), then put him up for auction and sell him to the highest bidder

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah. No wonder they threw the book at him.

I mean come on, who is really the one more deserving of punishment here: the fine upstanding job creator who had a small and momentary lapse of judgement, or the clearly bootstrap-deficient monster who – after choosing to be poor – doesn't have the moral fortitude to live on the streets like he should?

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 19 points 1 year ago

I'm not sorry and I will do it again

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

which is something they care deeply about.

They care about quarterly profits. Preventing fuckups of this scale requires long-term effort which is not profitable by itself, it only prevents possible future fuckups, and this is why proper QC etc. aren't done. Short term profits over everything else.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 17 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Well, if the executive leech class wants workers to have bossware, there's not all that much people can do about it. Can't just decide to not use it if your employer demands it

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 6 points 1 year ago

In fact, that guy might die "resisting arrest" face down on the ground with his hands handcuffed behind his back and a knee to the neck

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 38 points 1 year ago

Coincidentally this is pretty much the diagnosed ADHD starter pack as well

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 13 points 1 year ago

remora fish.

So in case somebody else here doesn't know squat about remoras, I went on Wikipedia and found out that they're fish that attach themselves to a host animal in a mutualistic arrangement. They remove ectoparasites and loose flakes of skin etc, and their diet is mainly composed of the host animal's shit.

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 42 points 1 year ago

Certainly not! Or other industries for that matter. It's a good thing executives everywhere aren't just concentrating on squeezing the maximum amount of money out of their companies and funneling it to themselves and their buddies on the board.

Sure, let's "rightsize" the company by firing 20% of our workforce (but not management!) and raise prices 30%, and demand that the remaining employees maintain productivity at the level it used to be before we fucked things up. Oh and no raises for the plebs, we can't afford it. Maybe a pizza party? One slice per employee though.

view more: ‹ prev next ›