cyclohexane

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Alright let's take a read. Let's start at the very beginning of the "scholarly analysis" section.

The widespread use in mass media of the term "Islamofascism" has been challenged as confusing because of its conceptual fuzziness [...] and linking Islam to that concept was more a matter of denigration than of ideological clarity [...] Walter Laqueur, after reviewing this and related terms, concluded that "Islamic fascism, Islamophobia and antisemitism, each in its way, are imprecise terms we could well do without but it is doubtful whether they can be removed from our political lexicon." [...] the term "Islamofascism" circulated mainly as a propaganda, rather than as an analytic, term after the September 11 attacks

Ahh, I didn't expect that you'd link me an article that says your argument is full of shit.

Ok ok let's look at the few scholars who had a position of agreement

The earliest example of the term "Islamofascism," according to William Safire,[10] occurs in an article penned by the Scottish scholar and writer Malise Ruthven writing in 1990.

As a neologism it was adopted broadly in the wake of the September 11 attacks to intimate that either all Muslims, or those Muslims who spoke of their social or political goals in terms of Islam, were fascists.[18] Khalid Duran is often credited with devising the phrase at that date. He used it in 2001 to characterize Islamism generally, as a doctrine that would compel both a state and its citizens to adopt the religion of Islam.[3][19][20] Neo-conservative journalist Lulu Schwartz is regarded as the first Westerner to adopt the term and popularise it in the aftermath of the attack on the World Trade Center.

Ahh, nice! Americans and Europeans, the inventors of fascism, think that Muslims are actually fascist. The same ones that support mass murder machines and wars around the world? I sure would trust those people... If I was the dumbest man on earth. Thankfully I'm far from that, but we know who is ๐Ÿ‘€.

I highly urge you to block my account so that you're less likely to embarrass yourself in the future.

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I personally liked podman's networking a lot more, but my issue is that it is not well documented. I hope that improves.

May I ask which networking issues you had?

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

Qutebrowser and Firefox

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Docker has rootless containers, too, although I think Podman has slightly better options for unprivileged uid management.

I have not used Docker rootless, but I imagine podman has much better and more flexible network configuration as well?

On systemd, I actually do not use systemd either, hence why I said I never tried those features. It is not a hard requirement at all. Though I have not tried to use any integrations with OpenRC and podman

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From my understanding, unless a shared library is used only by one process at a time, static linking can increase memory usage by multiplying the memory footprint of that library's code segment. So it is not only about disk space.

But I suppose for an increasing number of modern applications, data and heap is much larger than that (though I am not particularly a fan ...)

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I think Rust is a little hard to find contributors, and is also just hard in general. Too low level.

I would opt for a language like Kotlin, Go or TypeScript. Easier than Rust, more popular than, or similar to Rust popularity.

JS, Python and ruby might also be very easy and popular, but they're a little too loosey for me for a large project.

If I were to do it today, I would choose Scala purely out of interest. Such a cool language. But it's probably less practical and popular than the choices I named above

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

That's certainly an unpopular opinion. I like your bravery!

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago

I am not against the abaya itself. I am against women or girls being coerced into any kind of clothing. Unfortunately, most girls wearing abayas are coerced by their families. But again, I am against France coercing clothing onto girls too. What they do is even worse.

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Not that either. Have a read here, maybe you'll stop embarrassing yourself: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

It fell apart after colonialism, and then Western powers proceeded to fund extremist political groups like the brotherhood, Wahhabists, Al-Qaeda, etc. to combat the leftists.

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Wearing a hijab or abaya is not "bringing religion into school". It is bringing a person with whatever they always dress in outside into school. They are not trying to convert people or loudly calling for prayer in a disruptive manner. They are simply existing.

[โ€“] cyclohexane@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the recommendation, but I already know.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ