cx40

joined 7 months ago
[–] cx40@programming.dev 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks, that's a good start.

The bigger question for me is whether there's more to it than privacy and blurring out faces.

 

This is about Panoramax and not OSM, but I figured a local OSM community is a more appropriate place to ask than the one general Panoramax community.

I recently got myself a 360 camera and I'm looking into mapping out parts of my city and self hosting them through Panoramax. One of the requirements for federation (and I guess for making this data public at all) is that we follow any local laws surrounding publishing such data. Does anyone know where I can find information on what these local laws might be? Is it sufficient to just blur out faces or is there more to it? I'm in Montreal if that's relevant, though I do travel to different cities from time to time and might contribute from other places.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

That's also to make programming easier. Different programmers have different needs.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

But the main benefits of static typing is in making the programming part easier. What do you gain from translating dynamically typed languages into a statically typed language?

[–] cx40@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

asked questions that made educators interpret that I enjoyed bending the logic of what they were teaching.

I had this problem too but mainly for math. I'd do well in classes and tests, but the material just didn't make sense to me. It wasn't until I studied real analysis that everything started to click.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A trick I've employed is to pretend to believe in something completely different. If it says "no, you're wrong" and goes on to tell me what I actually believe, then it's a good indicator that I might be on the right path.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)
  • Specific heat capacity of water: 4.184J/(gC)
  • Average shower temperature: 37C
  • Cold tap water temperature: T
  • Shower head output: 2gallon/min = 7.57L/60s = 126ml/s = 126g/s

1s * (126g/s) * (4.184J/(gC)) * (37C - T) = 524J/C * (37C - T)

120Wh = 432000J

T = -787C

So I guess the math checks out if your city's water supply temperature is way below absolute zero.


Scratch that, let's assume the water actually flows, so T=0C. What water throughout do we need to achieve this level of power consumption?

1s * (X g/s) * (4.184J/(gC)) * (37C) = 432000J

X = 2791g/s = 44gpm

You would have to be showering with 17 showerheads simultaneously using showerheads that are rated at the highest legal flow rates in the US (2.5gpm).

[–] cx40@programming.dev 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, you can make fried rice with fresh rice. It's not exactly the same experience, but it's equally tasty imo. If you haven't tried it yet, give it a go. You might find that you like it too.

I doubt there would be enough of a market for precooked rice to make it worth selling. In households that do a lot of fried rice, this dish is usually more of a use-up-our-leftovers kind of meal than the sort of thing you go out of your way to make. The typical meal consists of white rice and sides of protein and vegetables. You make extra rice to make sure everyone has enough to eat in that meal, and whatever's left over goes in the fridge. You collect 2-3 days of rice this way and when you have enough, it becomes fried rice.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Men in Black 1997

He's the worm guy.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

They did give us OpenAI gym (now Gymnasium) and PPO. It's sad that they completely pivoted away from this line of work though.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

We've seen similar effects in the context of reinforcement learning (see the "primacy bias" works of Evgenii Nikishin). It makes sense that it would also apply to LLMs, and any other ML model.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 1 points 3 months ago

Early 30s now. I've been on this path since I was 18, so I guess I'd be happy to hear that I stuck with it. I'd probably also be disappointed to hear that I'm actually kind of bad at it.

[–] cx40@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They use the same symbols, but they're not bitwise operators anymore.

view more: next ›