I'd guess that if he was an agent, he isn't acting voluntarily. Instead he's probably influenced by chinese and saudi money.
Another simpler, but just as plausible explanation could be that he's basically a human with a giant ego that bounces from one incident to another. None of this seems very planned. Instead he seems to be acting on a whim.
Pari rypälepommia tuottaisi varmaan saman lopputuloksen.
My bad. You don't need a rocket to launch stuff.
I mean you could stay in space, if you were to reach escape velocity. Heat might be an issue though.
Tweaking the nuke to achieve a specific orbit might prove to be difficult. Also it's not like Blue Origin has nukes right?
Pahvihatun sisällä on kuitenkin pää, joka luultavasti näkyisi edelleen hyvin?
Do they also have a nonexistent budget?
Seems like hollywood. Dangling career opportunities as a reward for constenting to unwanted advances etc.
Jos kyseessä on lyhyen kantaman (6km) drone, niin eiköhän sitä ohjata ihmisen toimesta. Eli samaan tapaan kuin kaikki fpv dronet ukrainassa. ~~Päällimmäsienä mieleen jää ajatus siitä, että voikohan drone selvitä panoksen laukaisusta uutta käyttökertaa varten?~~
EDIT: näköjään artikkelissa mainittiinkin, että drone hajoaa kun panos räjähtää.
Sodan alkuvaiheessa puhuttiin paljon suuremmista droneista, mutta ne on ilmeisesti jääneet taka-alalle halvempien ja lyhyemmän kantaman ratkaisuiden tieltä. Yhdysvalloissakin on aluillaan projekti, jossa on tarkoitus tuottaa halpoja räjähteillä varustettuja droneja todella suurissa määrin kiinan laivastoa vastaan hyökkäämistä varten.
Muista linkatuista artikkeleista huomionarvoista on se, että pahvi on ilmeisesti jonkin sortin stealth materiaali 😀
Their government has been trying to keep the issue of aid in the public interest for a reason. Sometimes they might go too far, but I think people underestimate the fear a country would experience if they were highly dependent on outside help. Especially if it wasn't guaranteed to continue due to changes in the political leadership in the other countries.
As always the headline is somewhat misleading.
I guess that could be explained with the giant ego. Due to being so smart, he understands the situation better than the mainstream media. The easiest opposing view to latch onto would then be Russian propaganda.
EDIT: I have several friends who are also smart, and as such must question all msm news. As a result their worldview is left with a void that is usually filled with more fringe opinions.