cryball

joined 2 years ago
[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Am I reading the graphs right if I see the main problem being private yachts and flying? Ofc cars are also included in the transport emissions, but unless they make up the majority of the emissions, the effect of cutting out some of the flights would reduce emissions by a lot.

Seems like a reasonably easy problem to fix, if one was to implement some type of "carbon tax" that targeted at private boats and planes.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago

Jep. Itse mieltäisin esim liikunnan lisäämisen tai ruokavalion muuttamisen ei lääketieteellisiksi hoitokeinoiksi. Ei sen takia, että niiden vaikutuksille ei olisi näyttöä, vaan siksi, että ne on perinteisempiä hoitomuotoja.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Thats the point of having energy abundance. When electricity costs are low enough, it wouldn't matter, if the source of synthetic fuel was not the most energy efficient one.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But the naysayers will argue that your problem is not novel and a solution can be trivially deduced from the training data. Right?

I really dislike the simplified word predictor explanation that is given for how LLM's work. It makes it seem like the thing is a lookup table, while ignoring the nuances of what makes it work so well.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Another fellow here who didn't get into pokemon as a kid. I had a gameboy, but never got a pokemon game for some reason :/

For original entries in GBA/DS realm I'd play the third version (emerald & platinum). With remakes or gens without the third version, I wouldn't stress too much about what to buy.

If you're buying legit carts, then just get the one that you can find for a good price. Alternatively if a game has version exclusive pokemon that you really like, get that one.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Eiköhän lakimuutoksiin löydy rahat. Loput tulee sitten yhteisistä talkoista sun muista venymisistä, joilla pelastetaan tää hyvinvointiyhteiskunta.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

Ilmeisesti sama hyvä tavoite ei ole mikään uusi juttu, joten eiköhän tuloksetkin ole sen mukaisia.

Toisaalta tuolla artikkelissa mainittu yhdeksi syyksi päivähoidon välttelyyn kotihoidon tuki. Sen heikentämisellä voitaisiin kannustaa ihmisiä viemään ne lapset päivähoitoon. Toki samalla pitäisi lisätä päivähoidon houkuttelevuutta (alentaa maksuja), ja palkata lisää hoitajia. Epäilen, että näin ei tapahdu.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

This.

Even if some AI or algorithm could tell you that a certain area was less likely to be heavily mined, then what would prevent the opposing force from using similar tools to also identify the weak points?

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Känniläisten kuskaamisen ja huolenpidon siirto enenevissä määrin terveydenhuollon puolelle varmaan lisää entisestään alan houkuttelevuutta.

Löytyykö terveyspuolelta myös tarvittava osaaminen ja varusteet esim riitaa haastavien sekojen rauhoitteluun?

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago

Toivon todella, että ei ole kyse tämänkaltaisesta menettelystä. Toki helppo myydä keskivertoäänestäjälle, kun voidaan ilmoittaa, että säästetään näin paljon rahaa, ja syyttömillä ei ole mitään pelättävää.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Shouldn’t a different algorithm that adds a some sort of separate logic check be able to help tremendously?

Maybe, but it might not be that simple. The issue is that one would have to design that logic in a manner that can be verified by a human. At that point the logic would be quite specific to a single task and not generally useful at all. At that point the benefit of the AI is almost nil.

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I would be very interested to know why the trend has moved away from building reactors in time and within a reasonable budget. It seems that most projects after the turn of the millennium haven't been cost effective.

Why did we manage to build reactors well before but not now?

view more: ‹ prev next ›