conciselyverbose

joined 2 years ago
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago

lol at the settlement requiring deleting a thread.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 67 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Suits like this should permanently get everything you own, including subsidiaries and parent companies, placed in the public domain immediately.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

It's not. There's no evidence for any harm of any kind from THC or the other psychoactive ingredients in adults.

Smoking, specifically, yes, but there are many, many other ways to ingest it, and smoking is most common in large part because of the backwards ass laws.

It's not like alcohol, where the desired altered state is exchanged for fucking up your liver, kidneys, etc. It doesn't do any of that, even with extremely heavy use.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 33 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I'm assuming this one is because he's just going to tell them to fuck off.

There's no legal basis to take it down.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 18 points 2 years ago

lol they're probably just the ones who actually make good faith efforts to notify people.

Though sending a spreadsheet of names to a phishing email is truly fucking stupid beyond belief.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The only thing that matters is that (in adults) it's very clearly demonstrated by abundant research to be perfectly harmless.

In and of itself, the lack of harm makes it impossible for you to be a redeemable human being if you want to tell a consenting adult that they can't have it.

That's ignoring all the evidence supporting benefits.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 29 points 2 years ago (11 children)

The first one is a decent game.

But it also went to $20 extremely fast. Pretty much by itself, that takes the pressure off of rushing to buy it.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is laughable.

If someone was making a valve game with spiderman in it, the same thing would happen. They're only going to ignore it if the other owner has a pattern of being OK with it, and even then they might want written permission.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Because McCarthy is the head coach.

Both sides of the ball are his responsibility, and he's done the same horribly underachieving in the playoffs his entire career no matter who his coordinators have been.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I honestly don't see how you keep McCarthy. That was a shitshow. What the fuck were they doing on defense?

Your roster is stacked. Go get the GOAT. I guarantee you he notices that running soft two high zone all game against a team bullying you whenever they want to run and completing easy uncontested throws whenever they drop back is probably a bad idea.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

That was a truly awful showing, and coaching was a huge part of it. You know they want to bully you, they do, and you're just sitting in two high soft zones that also don't defend the pass all night.

If they fire McCarthy's ass and bring in Bill that team is a wagon though.

[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

They're defending their IP.

They're really wildly permissive with their IP, but combining it with other people's you also don't own is very obviously over the line.

view more: ‹ prev next ›