fully agree. we're actually reintroducing live coding interviews into our process because so many candidates made it onsite who then showed that they didn't really know how to code
right but unless you sign a contributor licensing agreement when you contribute then the copyright owner can't relicense code you contributed.
so if you contribute to a GPL codebase it's pretty legally perilous to try to unilaterally relicense code that isn't "yours".
this is pretty nebulous territory anyways, but I'd argue it's pretty unethical to relicense to a more restrictive license essentially "taking" the GPL code from contributors
I work with a lot of gen z engineers that are very competent
project soli was so cool. I loved having mmwave radar in my phone
Yes, with the current network this is true. I guess it feels like you're discounting the future growth of the constellation
Beam steering largely mitigates most of these problems. Fiber is definitely more scalable, but also far more expensive (somehow...) to provide last mile to the entire planet.
You seem to know a lot about these limits, can you elaborate?
I don't think there are actual physics limitations on network capacity right now
ah. tailscale is great for that. I personally just leave my home assistant exposed behind a reverse proxy
You don't need anything other than home assistant though, right? the companion apps already just do that
Tbh I just edit Google maps when it's wrong.
I'd rather be contributing that effort to open street maps, but there just aren't great turn-by-turn apps for that imo
on the other hand, it is REALLY annoying
hey, I love this idea, but we tried it and we kept getting candidates who managed to BS their way onsite and then waste our time ultimately.
it just didn't work. I really want it to work because I hated live coding too but it just didn't.
you can make live coding interviews that aren't actually difficult questions and are more about showing that you can think and write the most basic of code. that's what we do now.