This is a non-automated TL;DR summary of the article:
Justice Dept.: "Bruh"
charles
joined 2 years ago
He's the guy who has pioneered turning political fundraising into an MLM, among other things.
Yeah, like all store brands, there can be some good finds. And I think TJ has a higher hit ratio than most stores, but it's still far from most of them.
Care to elaborate? It's the first I've heard of it.
I'm really vibing to it could've been you. I just wish it were a bit longer of a song.
The article specifically says this is not permitted.
Here are some problems with the "why would you use any social media on a work device?"
-
Social media outreach. The government needs to talk to people where they are for public information campaigns. This includes social media as well as traditional media
-
What constitutes "work device" is being broadly interpreted. So broadly that it also includes your personal device if you do any kind of "work" on it. I can vouch for this personally on a federal project. This not only means "don't install social on work devices", but "don't install socials on personal devices unless you delete email, slack, and any other means by which you might work. This is a huge violation of privacy. Of course I can just say "fuck you, no work on my BYOD", which I have, but now I'm at a performance disadvantage with my peers. I could also say "buy me a phone", which I have; but they won't.
-
Just because you don't use/don't like TikTok it doesn't mean that's where this slippery slope ends. What's next? No personal use of queer dating apps? Why not
-
With any BYOD policy, the organization is accepting the risk of what may come on a personally owned device. Carving out an exception for a single application is a very clear anti-pattern of security.
Android sends alerts if an app reads data from your clipboard.
Right, these people are so quick to "well akshually" they completely ignore the inflated house costs since which layers more unaffordability on top of already unaffordability.