cecinestpasunbot

joined 2 years ago
[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Okay then tell me, what have you actually read by the guy? Everything you’ve said just tells that at best you skimmed the Communist Manifesto without the patience or curiosity to understand why Marx wrote it and the context under which it was written. You seem so ready and willing to casually dismiss him even though his work is foundational to much of modern sociology right alongside Max Weber.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey now don’t make fun of Sleezy! An intro to political science class taught by some adjunct has all the information you could possibly need on Marxism! All the stuff about linen is just for the fashion nerds.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (15 children)

It’s painfully obvious you’ve never really engaged with Marx’s writings.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AOC has been increasingly aligned with the Democratic Party elite these days. My guess is she’s wants to run for senate someday and needs to appear loyal to the people who could make or break her campaign. That said, I do think the kind of insider politics she seems to be engaging in is a betrayal of the progressive values she once held.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Biden supporters aren’t really left wing though. The left is barely a thing in the US.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Hey don’t leave out Rashida Tlaib and Cori Bush! IMO they have better politics than even AOC but they just don’t have as much name recognition.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you have to defend Nazi’s because the SC will give them a more favorable decision then the legal system is already fucked beyond repair.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

“It is a misinterpretation of our research to suggest that the novel coronavirus originated outside China”

This is a direct quote from the scientist whose work you are trying to cite. It was added to the article because people like you were intentionally misinterpreting his work.

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/covid-19-genetic-network-analysis-provides-snapshot-of-pandemic-origins

Don’t try this “something you haven’t researched” shit when you clearly don’t know the first thing about phylogenomics.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You really don’t have to. It’s a theory anyone who knows anything about the science won’t take seriously. It just gained traction because some Chinese media claimed it was a possibility after the Wuhan lab leak theory was getting talked up in western media. That’s why hexbears latched onto it so much. However, in a weirdly new way to express western chauvinism, many hexbears just ignore the Chinese scientists who did the hard work of helping to identify the likely origins of Covid. They mean well and rightfully question the US state department story but it’s painfully frustrating all the same.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No that’s not how this works. There are a so many things that could cause respiratory illnesses and the vast majority of them aren’t covid. Whatever you say was happening at ft detrick doesn’t have to be covid at all. You only believe it so because the narrative suits your particular bias. Again you’re doing exactly what the author of this article is doing, minus her capacity to fake scientific credibility for a general audience and her pro state departments bias.

More importantly, if you even want to suggest it was covid you would have to be able to explain away the evidence we do have. That’s something the author of this article tries but fails to do. I don’t expect you’ll have better arguments than the papers she cites. You’d have better luck parroting what they say if you want to make your case.

That said, I feel like I’m going to have a hard time convincing you you’re wrong because I doubt you understand anything about the science in question. You first need to understand that virologists can trace the evolution of a virus down to a precise timescale and lineage. Viruses mutate in a predictably rapidly but consistent rate. Think of their genetic code as like an atomic clock in a way. It’s so precise in fact that scientists can trace the origins of every circulating strain of Covid to a set of almost uniformly identical strains found in Wuhan. They can also pin down a precise time point for when those strains started spreading in humans. From that they can conclude that it is incredibly unlikely the virus was spreading in humans before reaching Wuhan. Additionally scientists can lay out the locations of where the virus was as it mutated and spread, not just globally but within Wuhan itself. That analysis shows us that the Wuhan wet market was the likely epicenter of the spread. There’s more but if you want to discuss further than that you’ll really need to read up on the tools and methods virologists use.

That’s all to say that the evidence available makes any ft detrick scenario just so incredibly unlikely it’s not worth considering seriously. Seek truth from facts BMF and you’ll be much better at deducing when and how the state department is lying to you.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (6 children)

If you believe that then you’re making the same mistake as this author just without the whole carrying water for imperialism thing which of course matters.

[–] cecinestpasunbot@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

In my ignorance I thought that once there was a scientific consensus that a zoonotic crossover event was the likely origin for covid this shit would be over, at least among liberals. How naive I was…

view more: ‹ prev next ›