ceasarlegsvin

joined 1 year ago
[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

It's not like Maria counts as a person in their system or anything what rights could they possibly be violating

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 119 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  • run a speed test on my quantum computer so I know how fast it's running

  • it vanishes without a trace

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Aes1 and sha1 do very different things...

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's locked behind the battle pass

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 39 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Using sudo costs in game currency

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

How on earth are people responding to this as if it's a legitimate take

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Early access in a controlled environment is a really good way to make sure people don't fall down rabbit holes.

Obviously it depends how old, but if you block a specific website it's only a matter of time before they work out a way around the block

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

"coal exists, so coffee is sustainable, but not coffee in pod form" is legitimately one of the dumbest things I've read on this site, so I'm just surprised you're hitching your wagon to that post

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yes because it doesn't make any sense. Not only is the coffee industry not really all that sustainable, it's completely meaningless to compare two types of resource in entirely different categories.

It doesn't matter how "unsustainable" a medically necessary resource like helium is in comparison to literally any amount of environmental or social damage caused by the persuit of a luxury good.

Also, as a rebuttal to a rebuttal to the idea that canned coffee is still better it doesn't make any sense, because the logic that "coal isn't sustainable" could justify literally any amount of ecological damage in the coffee supply chain, thereby justifying the pods. You could chop down and burn a tree for every sack of coffee you fill, for fun, and it still probably wouldn't be as unsustainable as coal.

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Me: no coffee is environmentally sustainable or a necessity

You: damn they must be shilling for big coffee

Also you realise the fediverse isn't large enough to justify marketing on, right?

My highest rated comment is literally condoning videogame piracy. Did you think that accusation through at all? I'm honestly baffled.

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

How does the coffee get from where it's grown and into the can? Where does the space to grow it come from?

Also, what are you talking about? Helium's uses are largely medical, which is pretty far up there on the list of things we can't do without.

Also, so what? These new coffee pods are also more sustainable than both helium and coal when you use whatever definition of sustainability you're using

[–] ceasarlegsvin@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

If you're playing that game, you don't need any coffee at all, so none of it is sustainable.

view more: ‹ prev next ›