captcha

joined 4 years ago
[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 43 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Hey he actually showed up this time!

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I think the picture is stretched but some toilets in the US have a pronounced oval shape.

becauseFor our big ๐Ÿ†

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

The fundamental ideology of capitalism is that people with capital reap the profits

That's not an ideology. That's the actual material conditions of capitalism. An ideology exists in people's minds. Its the justification for those material conditions. The capitalist justification is "the freer the markets the freer the people". Sometimes people see through that bullshit and they adopt a new ideology, usually some variant of fascism.

The Nazi's and many fascists will cannibalize sectors of the market that dont get along with the new regime. This isn't a particularly novel observation.

Its like you understand that everything the capitalists told you is bullshit but you still want the fake goal they set up. So you kept the label of "free market" and slapped it on "well regulated market" and are pretending like you've done some clever judo. Everyone will call you a market socialist because that's what you want.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

reddit needed capital funding to get started in a capitalist economy

very-intelligent

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Look man, good on you for understanding that "free markets", the fundamental ideology of capitalism, is antagonistic to people's liberty. Its just wild that you acknowledge that but then go on to insist we should keep doing free markets and capitalism.

Free markets and capitalism will always both ideologically and materially put people into power who disagree with you, people who want to deregulate the market and restrict people's freedom. In order to actually do what you want you must shut those people, the bourgeoisie, out of power. It doesnt matter if you do that through revolutionary violence like the communists or through peaceful democracy like so many Latin american nations. You will be met with violence from the bourgeoisie. Doesnt matter if all you want is an actually regulated free market.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 5 points 2 years ago

If you want your capitalism well regulated, put communists in charge of regulating it.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 3 points 2 years ago

In the colloquial sense middle class is just an income bracket usually small business owners and skilled workers. Its a fairly meaningless categorization for describing someone's relationship to society.

Small business owners (aka petite bourgeoisie) however, are the base of fascism as they are both heavily and precariously invested in capitalism. When capitalism enters a period of crisis, its the petite bourgeoisie that get politically motivated to "save" it by more fully subjugating the working class, but also intervening in the market to preserve sectors more loyal to the new fascist regime.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (4 children)

You should probably read up on the original author of reddit, Aaron Schwartz, before claiming capitalism made it.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 9 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Free market is the divine right of capitalism.

regulated enough that it stays free

What a perfect somersault.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 13 points 2 years ago

The liberals just aren't used to actual left wing push back.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The vast majority of world poverty reduction that capitalists claim has been from China. But hey, maybe China is a capitalist economy but you just need a communist government to regulate it effectively.

[โ€“] captcha@hexbear.net 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Being pro-Dessalines also underlines "tankie" mindset. Dessalines was an utter tyrant who declared himself emporer but his subjects weren't slaves and everyone opposing him wanted to re-enslave them. Sure Toussaint Louverture would've been ideal but Napoleon rejected him so he failed. Its all strictly "lesser of two evils" mindset.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ