cannibalkitteh

I like generic names for hacking groups like this. It could easily describe dozens of my friends and their polycules.

Not even a month in and the amount of BS thrown into the public's face has to exceed some sort of methane pollution limit.

It did, but they undid the limits on that too, probably.

It's not the number of people in the center, it's the number of people able to enter at one time. Basically, it allows them to ensure that everyone is being clearly identified on entry.

They're only concerned with grinding it to a halt. Then they can point to a private sector solution that can be contracted in.

This can include invesigators' findings and interviews.

I mean, I'm all for deporting the US military, but what country would take them?

Would being shitty to trans people be okay if they did make egg prices cheaper?

I dunno, teens and adult children can be fussy too.

I'm inclined to agree with most of this, and while I feel like parts of this have been poorly communicated and executed, I do feel like most folks care and want the community to flourish. We're all just people, and sometimes we communicate ineffectively, but like you, I hope all this energy goes toward creating and growing, and making a positive change.

As far as moderation goes, nothing is changing.

How are we supposed to square this with the rationale for the break being to get away from stricter moderating?

When it comes to moderating, we want to cultivate an environment where queer people feel welcome, but the point where we differ from Ada is not being allowed to respectfully disagree. As far as we're concerned, that person didn't break any of our rules.

My concern at this point hinges on what constitutes "respect" and what things are tolerable to disagree about. Particularly with the backdrop of a society that sees disagreeing with my gender as respectful disagreement.

Don't get me wrong, we're not gonna start tolerating MAGA shit or anything, we just don't want people to be afraid of getting ejected from the community over a relatively mild take or for committing wrongthink.

That really becomes a question of how far is too far, while everyone is subjected to potentially harmful takes because they're not overtly hateful. That's the thing that burned a lot of us out on Reddit.

That still doesn't really tell me anything. What kinds of differences of opinions? What kinds of things have resulted in admin action that the mods would be more lenient on?