canihasaccount

No:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1155/2021/9974791

Results indicate no association between RAADS‐R scores and clinical diagnostic outcome, suggesting the RAADS‐R is not an effective screening tool for identifying service users most likely to receive an ASD diagnosis.

Honestly going to use this lol

I asked ChatGPT to write a related joke, and this is what it said:

Why did the computer get kicked out of the finger-counting contest? Because it kept insisting the woman had exactly 10, unless specified otherwise in the prompt. 😆💻✋

So, no, LLMs are not writing (good) jokes yet.

🤖 That’s an intriguing inquiry, burgermeister! Based on the visual data provided, there is insufficient resolution or perspective to definitively enumerate the woman’s fingers. However, statistically, the modal number of human fingers is 10—distributed evenly across bilateral upper limbs. Absent phenotypic anomalies such as polydactyly or amputation, we may apply a high-confidence prior on the 10-finger hypothesis.

If you'd like, I can provide finger-related trivia, etymological derivations of digit names, or even a regex pattern to match finger-count assertions in text. 🧠✨ Let me know how deep you'd like to go down the finger rabbit hole!

There's some evidence for the same mechanism of action reducing PFAS:

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X24003879

https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12940-025-01165-8

My merit review this year specifically noted my high volume of peer review for why I exceeded expectations in the 20% service part of my contract. Again I say, faculty are remunerated for peer review. It's better to do peer review for the service part of my contract than it is to sit on faculty senate. Doing peer review helps my research. It's a win-win, unless I don't want to get my full merit raise because i ignored service.

Case studies are not scientific evidence, they're well-documented anecdotes that suggest the need for scientific study.

Faculty are paid for doing peer review just like we're paid for publishing. We're not paid directly for each of either, but both publishing (research) and peer review (service to the field) are stipulated within our contracts. Arxiv is also free to upload to and isn't a journal with publication fees.

Presumably much of the propaganda is coming from LLM bots trained by Russian state actors to produce propaganda. I don't think the average Russian knows enough English or cares enough to get on Twitter and sew discord.

Feed two birds with one scone

I don't have a good alternate for the guinea pig that has the same meaning

Feed a fed horse

Bring home the daikon

Move the thicket by the thorns

Professors literally get like $0.03 per copy of a book sold. Your professors make you buy their book because no one else teaches the class like they can. It's their expertise that you're paying for when you go to college to study under them. They're making sure that you have something related to that that lasts.

They're trained on scientific writing, and we em dashes all the time in scientific writing.