cambionn

joined 2 years ago
[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago

I use Astiga, which is like a private Spotify you need to fill with music yourself. I buy CDs which I rip to get music to fill it with. Leaves me with higher quality audio and no trash to filter trough while never having to worry about licencing issues removing my favourite music, and leaves artists with much more financial support than services like Spotify will ever offer.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 5 points 2 years ago

Signal for personal chats, Matrix for community chats.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

There are quite some results if you search online, but here's one with some specific info: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/129917/how-does-a-website-know-the-dns-server-a-client-uses

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago

but I think Google will do more. They've been trying to break it for ages. It's one of those never ending fights. Doubt it'll end soon.

Even if it does, then we're at a point that "just use a good browser and uBlock Origin" also won't cut it. Honestly, those will break much sooner than dedicated projects that are much more sophisticated in getting around YT-stuff. As soon as they put a login requirement on the site, which is needed to break apps like NewPipe, the browser + uBlock idea already won't cut it anymore, no matter if you got a VPN ot not.

As for Aurora, as long as Average Joe still uses Google Play without a care I'm not too worried about it. People use AdBlock for the ease, but using Aurora doesnt't give ease. It's only the tiny group of privacy people interested in it, which is a much smaller demographic that'll be hard to convert to Google services. If they break Aurora, the amount of non-playstore requests to developers is going to to pump up and as long as stuff like APKMirror and apk downloads from vendors still exist people will download by hand over using the Play Store. It's a lot of trouble that likely just leads people further away from Google.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Well, you're right. I was mixing a few things up in my head. My bad. Altrough I did find a few interesting ways that can be used by websites to find client side DNS, it isn't exactly the norm or likely to hit you with custom setups.

I retract my point on DNS, but the general notion that do-it-yourself isn't always better stays. Al be it off-topic here now.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Ah yes, poor Elon is too poor to pay his bills. And Google must have suddenly increased the prices, it's not like they have contracts to adhere to regarding those kinda things.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

NewPipe (on Piped technology) is working fine here? As long as YT isn't behind a login they will keep working. If they do put it behind login, tbf they'll likely find way around it again sooner or later.

I agree that front-ends are always in an endless fight against these Big Tech solutions. But for content not available on other platforms it's an necesity and a better solution than simply an adblocker. And sadly it'll take a long time before content moves away, Average Joe isn't really worried about Google as much as they are about the cons of moving away from YT.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

As I said:

as it'll make fingerprinting also much easier.

Fingerprinting is a technique where they look at everything they can grab from received requests and try to use that info to identify people. The things you block (like ads and trackers), the used DNS, your user agent, your IP, etc. It's all used to try to identify you. The more you blend in with others, the harder to identify you are. The more custom stuff you have, the easier to identify you are.

If fingerprinting or not having to trust third parties is more important depends on your threat model. But it's important to know the risks of a trust-no-one do-it-yourself approach when making the decision.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 years ago

Looking at my phone to brainlessly scroll, just to realise I don't have signal because I'm in an elevator.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

I'm interested in linguistics in a linguistic way. Languages tell something about a culture. For examply by what subjects have many words and which don't. Or how seperated ranks in society are by the amount of (used) formality forms. The level of directness might corolate to the level of pragmatism. What foreign influence there is can be partly seen by loanwords and writing symbols. Etc. Etc.

But computer languages are hardly linguistic, most of them are just English in a specific syntax. I love computers, but they interest me in a technical way. Even the best AI relies on switches turning off and on, yes and no's, 1's and 0's. It's black and white logical mathmatics. In the end, programming languages are little more than "the creator thought this was a good way to handle which switches should go on and off", and you just use what's most practical for your use-case. That is, quantum computers aside, but even those are similar in that really. Just more complex.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

Use your own.

That may not always be the best way to go, as it'll make fingerprinting also much easier. The more custom your setup is, the less there are like you, the easier your tracked by fingerprinting techniques.

Not saying it's bad per se, but the idea that trusting no one and setting everything up yourself is always more private isn't true either. Both providers and do-it-yourself have negative sides one should stay critical about.

[–] cambionn@feddit.nl 1 points 2 years ago

I always just say "I'm on Lemmy/I'm a Lemmy user". People who use Google also aren't a "Googler" or something 🫠.

I guess I'm no fun at parties...

view more: ‹ prev next ›