burrp
You misunderstood. I said the public availability does not grant OpenAI the right to use content improperly. The authors should also sue the party who leaked their works without license.
I'd love to know the source for the works that were allegedly violated. Presuming OpenAI didn't scour zlib/libgen for the books, where on the net were the cleartext copies of their writings stored?
Being stored in cleartext publicly on the net does not grant OpenAI the right to misuse their art, but the authors need to go after the entity that leaked their works.
How many reviews of their works have been posted online? You don't need the source text.
Luckett is an unrepentant worm. Chapman is to be commended for calling him out.
Admins paid off? That's absurd. Lemmy.world are taking a moderate wait-and-see approach. I disagree with that stance, but to insinuate they are corrupt because they aren't as reactionary as you are is ridiculous.
I host it on a very small VPS. A huge benefit is c/all never contains communities I have no interest in. Therefore, communities I subscribe to are “favorites”. c/all is a superset of my favorites plus communities I check less frequently.
Presumption of innocence
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Yes, I spun up my own instance. Partly for fun, but also to have control over my own federation should conflict affect an instance someone else operates.
Keep it civil.
My distrust is in Google, not technology.
I'm not a lemm.ee user, but I support defederation should Meta decide to permit access to Lemmy instances. We're here to escape Silicon Valley, not look for opportunities to invite them to dinner.
This is the view an admin has for a user via the existing Lemmy web UI. No email or IP is visible.
The user's data would only be available to someone with direct access to the database.